Can I introduce evidence on redirect?

1. Show your exhibit to the other side and mark it. ...
2. Have your witness identify your exhibits. ...
3. Show the witness has first-hand knowledge of the exhibit. ...
4. Ask the judge to admit the exhibit as evidence.

Can you introduce evidence on redirect?

[T]he court should only allow so much additional evidence to be introduced on redirect as is necessary to meet what has been brought out in the meantime upon the cross-examination. . . .

Can you introduce new evidence in a trial?

Evidence may not be available or be known at the outset of litigation. If a matter goes to trial and new or newly available evidence comes up, it can be introduced into evidence, but there are certain caveats and rules that must be followed.

What is not allowed in cross-examination?

Some 'don'ts' of cross-examination are not to ask if the answer is not already known by the cross-examiner, not to repeat direct examination, not to be diverted from the objective of the cross-examination, and not to let the opposing attorney interrupt the cross-examination.

When can you introduce extrinsic evidence?

Extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is admissible if both of the following apply: (1) If the statement is offered solely for the purpose of impeaching the witness, the witness is afforded a prior opportunity to explain or deny the statement and the opposite party is afforded an opportunity ...

What is the rule 607?

Three Government attorneys discuss Federal Rules 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, and 613 pertaining to witnesses and suggest how prosecuting attorneys can apply them during cross-examination. Rule 607 asserts that a witness's credibility can be attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness.

How can I introduce my evidence?

Use a claim or argument to introduce the evidence.

Another option is to use your own claim or argument to introduce the evidence in a clear, assertive way. Keep the claim or argument short and relevant. Back it up with your sources. Use a colon after the claim or argument.

What comes after redirect examination?

Code § 772. Current through the 2023 Legislative Session. Section 772 - Phases of examination (a) The examination of a witness shall proceed in the following phases: direct examination, cross-examination, redirect examination, recross-examination, and continuing thereafter by redirect and recross-examination.

Can you ask yes or no questions on cross-examination?

A cross- examination question should be very pointed and requires only a one-word answer, preferably “yes” or “no.” The questions that you ask on cross-examination have to be related, in some way, to the issues that the witness talked about during direct examination.

What happens in a redirect?

Redirects are by far the most common method of redirection where the request is handled at the server level. The original request does not load, and the server reads the instructions and delivers a different web page rather than loading the first request.

What is the difference between cross-examination and redirect?

The prosecution's questioning of that witness is direct examination. The defense lawyer's questioning of the same is cross-examination. "Redirect" and "recross" examination are just what they sound like—the lawyers' chances to question the witness again, before that witness finishes testifying.

What is badgering the witness?

Definition: Badgering the witness is when a lawyer asks a witness too many questions that are argumentative, rude, or repetitive during cross-examination. This can be distracting and prevent the witness from giving accurate information.

What is the rule 609 evidence?

Impeachment by Evidence of A Criminal Conviction. (2) for any crime regardless of the punishment, the evidence must be admitted if the court can readily determine that establishing the elements of the crime required proving - or the witness's admitting - a dishonest act or false statement.

What makes a witness not credible?

An attorney can show jurors a witness is not credible by showing: 1) inconsistent statements, 2) reputation for untruthfulness, 3) defects in perception, 4) prior convictions that show dishonesty or untruthfulness, and 5) bias .

What is the rule against extrinsic evidence?

The parol evidence rule bars extrinsic evidence , including prior or contemporaneous oral agreements and prior or contemporaneous written agreements, that contradict or create a variation of a term in writing that the parties intended to be completely integrated .

Can you lead a witness on redirect?

(a) Except under special circumstances where the interests of justice otherwise require: (1) A leading question may not be asked of a witness on direct or redirect examination. (2) A leading question may be asked of a witness on cross-examination or recross-examination.

Can you introduce evidence during cross-examination?

For such purposes, the Federal Rules of Evidence allow the introduction of extrinsic evidence on cross-examination only if it is related to the witness's character for truthfulness.

What is the hearsay rule?

California's "hearsay rule," defined under Evidence Code 1200, is a law that states that third-party hearsay cannot be used as evidence in a trial. This rule is based on the principle that hearsay is often unreliable and cannot be cross-examined.

How do you introduce another evidence?

Can you try someone again with new evidence?

In California law, this protection is codified in Penal Code 687 PC, which states: "No person can be subjected to a second prosecution for a public offense for which he has once been prosecuted and convicted or acquitted."

Do trial courts hear new evidence?

How Appellate Courts are Different from Trial Courts. At a trial in a U.S. District Court, witnesses give testimony and a judge or jury decides who is guilty or not guilty — or who is liable or not liable. The appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence.