Does Article 3 establish the Supreme Court?

Asked by: Prof. Shaun Ratke  |  Last update: January 30, 2026
Score: 4.1/5 (64 votes)

Yes, Article III of the U.S. Constitution establishes the judicial branch, vesting the nation's judicial power in "one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish," meaning it creates the Supreme Court and grants Congress the power to set up lower federal courts, which Congress did with the Judiciary Act of 1789.

Does article 3 create the Supreme Court?

Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.

Which Court is created by article III of the US Constitution?

Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. Learn more about the Supreme Court.

What does the Constitution not say about the Supreme Court?

However, the Constitution is silent on other matters such as the size and composition of the Supreme Court, the time and place for sitting, and the Court's internal organization, leaving those questions to Congress. Act of Mar. 8, 1802, ch.

What does article 3 mean in simple terms?

Article Three of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the U.S. federal government. Under Article Three, the judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of the United States, as well as lower courts created by Congress.

Does Article III Establish The Limits Of The Court's Powers? - CountyOffice.org

37 related questions found

Can the Supreme Court overrule the Constitution?

Although the Supreme Court has shown less reluctance to overrule its decisions on constitutional questions than its decisions on statutory questions, the Court has nevertheless stated that there must be some special justification—or, at least “strong grounds”—that goes beyond disagreeing with a prior decision's ...

Why is article 3 so important?

Section One of Article III is a cornerstone of our legal system. It establishes the Supreme Court, and it is the basis of the federal court system. It has served those purposes from the very beginning.

Why did the founding fathers create the Supreme Court?

Hamilton had written that through the practice of judicial review the Court ensured that the will of the whole people, as expressed in their Constitution, would be supreme over the will of a legislature, whose statutes might express only the temporary will of part of the people.

Can a president remove a Supreme Court Justice?

No, a President cannot remove a Supreme Court Justice; only Congress has the power to do so through the impeachment process (House impeaches, Senate convicts) for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," ensuring judicial independence and lifetime tenure ("good behavior") for Article III judges. 

Who appointed John Jay to become a Supreme Court Justice?

When George Washington began considering appointments for the new government, he knew he wanted John Jay to hold a leadership position. He eventually appointed Jay as the first Chief Justice of the United States in 1789.

Who has more power than the Supreme Court?

Congress and the Judicial Branch: Negotiation

Congress creates laws; the Supreme Court interprets those laws in the context of legal disputes and rules on their constitutionality. Congress can change the courts' size, structure, and jurisdiction.

Has Article III ever been amended?

Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 11. The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Why aren't Supreme Court justices elected?

Members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President subject to the approval of the Senate. To ensure an independent Judiciary and to protect judges from partisan pressures, the Constitution provides that judges serve during “good Behaviour,” which has generally meant life terms.

What are the limitations of Article 3?

III, Section 2, Clause 1) as embodying two distinct limitations on exercise of judicial review: a bar on the issuance of advisory opinions, and a requirement that parties must have standing. In this context, "controversy" means an actual dispute between the parties.

Are Supreme Court justices supposed to be non-partisan?

Fact: The Supreme Court is non-partisan and upholds the rule of law impartially. The Supreme Court is the only non-partisan branch of the federal government. Each Justice comes to a decision on a case based on their own legal assessment.

What is Article 3 of the Constitution for dummies?

Article III – The Judicial Branch.

The article states that the court of last resort is the U.S. Supreme Court and that the U.S. Congress has the power to determine the size and scope of those courts below it. All judges are appointed for life unless they resign or are charged with bad behavior.

How did Trump appoint so many Supreme Court justices?

The Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett confirmations were enabled by a rule change made by Senate Republicans in 2017, which applied the 'nuclear option' to Supreme Court nominees and allowed nominations to be advanced by a simple majority vote rather than the historical norm of a three-fifths supermajority vote.

Can the president fire the vice president?

The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the authority to remove the vice president of the United States from office in two separate proceedings. The first one takes place in the House of Representatives, which impeaches the vice president by approving articles of impeachment through a simple majority vote.

How many senators does it take to impeach a Supreme Court justice?

The Constitution grants the Senate the sole power to try all impeachments, and establishes four requirements for an impeachment trial in the Senate: (1) the support of two-thirds of Senators present is necessary to convict; (2) Senators must take an oath or an affirmation; (3) the punishments the Senate can issue ...

Can a president overturn a Supreme Court ruling?

No, the President cannot directly overturn a Supreme Court decision; only the Court itself (through a new ruling), the Constitution (via amendment), or new legislation by Congress can overturn a major ruling, though Presidents can try to influence future decisions by appointing new justices or challenge rulings through appeals, and historically, some have selectively enforced or ignored certain rulings, as seen with Lincoln and the Dred Scott case. 

Can the Senate refuse to confirm a Supreme Court justice?

A simple majority vote is required to confirm or to reject a nominee. Historically, such rejections are relatively uncommon. Of the 37 unsuccessful Supreme Court nominations since 1789, only 11 nominees have been rejected in a Senate roll-call vote.

Who has the power to increase the size of the Supreme Court?

Article III establishes the Supreme Court, but it leaves to Congress to determine the details of how the court is structured and what it does. For example, it is well established that Congress can change the number of seats on the court or direct the justices to hear cases in lower federal courts.

What is article 3 in simple terms?

The Judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

What happens if the Supreme Court does not follow the Constitution?

If the Supreme Court decides that the law does not follow the Constitution, then the law is no longer valid. These decisions affect everyone in the United States. The Supreme Court's decisions are final and all other laws must follow them.

Why is article 3 an absolute right?

This right is absolute. It is never justifiable to torture someone, whatever the circumstances. On a basic level, the reason why this ban is absolute is very simple: torture and inhuman or degrading treatment is wrong because it violates our human dignity.