How often do judges write dissents?

Asked by: Christy Monahan II  |  Last update: April 17, 2026
Score: 4.2/5 (66 votes)

Judges write dissents fairly often, especially in appellate courts like the U.S. Supreme Court, where rates can exceed 30-40% of cases, particularly in contentious areas like civil rights and First Amendment issues, though frequency varies significantly by court, era, and specific judges, with some courts seeing much higher rates (like the Sixth Circuit or Federal Circuit) and others less, as dissents highlight flaws, persuade colleagues, and shape future law.

Is a dissenting opinion always published?

Whereas, the dissenting opinions of judges of the Constitutional Court have been published ever since its creation in 1993 and some of them have had a significant effect on the subsequent case law and legal theory, judges of the Supreme Administrative Court can publish their dissenting opinions only since a 2012 ...

Why would a judge write a dissenting opinion?

Nonetheless, dissenting opinions preserve minority viewpoints on contested legal issues and contribute to the public debate of these issues. In rare circumstances, the views expressed in a dissenting opinion are adopted as law in future court cases or encourage legislation overriding the majority opinion.

What happens when a judge dissents?

Significance: Although a dissenting opinion has no legal effect, it allows justices to call attention to perceived errors in the majority's reasoning and to suggest to potential opponents strategies for circumventing or overturning the majority result. Dissents may also influence the Court's final majority opinion.

Can a judge show favoritism?

Courts are required to make sure that each judge's orders, rulings, and decisions are based on the sound exercise of judicial discretion and balancing competing rights and interests, rather than being influenced by stereotypes or biases. (Cal Rules of Ct, Standards of J Admin 10.20(b)(3).)

Why Do Supreme Court Judges Write Dissenting Opinions? - Justice System Explained

42 related questions found

How to deal with an unfair judge?

If a judge is unfair, you can file an appeal for rulings, request the judge to recuse themselves, file a motion for reconsideration, or submit a formal complaint to the judicial oversight body for misconduct, but you generally cannot sue the judge due to judicial immunity; always document everything and seek legal counsel for strategy. 

What famous cases had strong dissents?

Famous U.S. Supreme Court cases with influential dissents include Plessy v. Ferguson (Harlan's "Our Constitution is color-blind" dissent), Dred Scott v. Sandford (Curtis's dissent), Olmstead v. United States (Brandeis's dissent on privacy), and Korematsu v. United States (Jackson's dissent against Japanese Internment), with Justices like RBG, Scalia, and Holmes also known for powerful dissents that often foreshadowed future legal shifts.
 

What are the two types of dissent?

There are three types of dissent: articulated, latent, and displaced (Kassing, 1998).

  • Articulated. Involves expressing dissent openly and clearly in a constructive fashion to members of an organization that can effectively influence organization adjustment. ...
  • Latent. ...
  • Displaced.

What happens when a judge shows bias?

If a judge shows actual bias during a trial, the defendant can ask for a new trial. For this to happen, the bias must meet these conditions: Evidence of Prejudice: There has to be clear proof that the judge acted unfairly.

What qualifies as dissent?

A dissent refers to at least one party's disagreement with the majority opinion. An appellate judge or Supreme Court Justice who writes an opinion opposing the holding is said to write a dissenting opinion.

What are the benefits of dissent?

According to psychology professor and author of In Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business, Charlan Nemeth, just one dissenting voice provides these three benefits: Broadens our thinking, motivating us to be more flexible and consider more information, often from different sources.

Is there a limit to dissenting opinions?

There is no Constitutional Limit on dissenting opinions. The practical limit would be four if a decision was 5–4 and all four in the minority wrote opinions. Remember that opinions don't decide cases, the majority of “votes” decides the outcome.

When would a justice write a dissenting opinion?

Dissenting opinions are only for high-profile cases: They can arise in any case where judges disagree, regardless of the case's visibility. Judges must write a dissenting opinion if they disagree: Not all judges choose to write dissenting opinions, even if they disagree.

Who can overturn a Supreme Court decision?

A Supreme Court decision can be overturned by the Supreme Court itself in a later case (stare decisis), through a constitutional amendment passed by Congress and states, or if Congress passes new legislation to clarify or change the law the Court interpreted (for statutory, not constitutional, rulings). While the Court is the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution, these mechanisms allow for changes in interpretation or law over time.
 

Is a dissenting opinion binding?

Courts and scholars often clarify that a dissenting opinion is not binding. Outside the universe of precedent, that authority defies easy description. Emerging from the pen of a judge wearing a black robe and acting in an official capacity, a dissenting opinion exhibits the form of the law.

What are the 3 P's of dissent?

PERSONAL, PROVOCATIVE, PUBLIC

Any one or combination of the three P's can lead the referee to a judgment of FOUL or ABUSIVE (often FOUL AND ABUSIVE).

What does it mean when a judge says they dissent?

Dissent refers to a disagreement or difference of opinion, particularly in a legal context where judges express an alternative viewpoint from the majority opinion. It also signifies the act of withholding approval or assent to a decision or proposal.

How do you show dissent respectfully?

“I respectfully disagree.” Clearly stating your thoughts leaves no room for ambiguity and is sometimes the best course of action. This tactic is best for when you can speak from direct knowledge or experience, letting others know your (well-informed) opinion can stop the team from wasting valuable time and resources.

What is the most ridiculous court case?

20 of the Most Ridiculous Court Cases Ever (But They Really Happened!)

  • Crocs Shrinking Lawsuit (2023) ...
  • Subway Tuna Allegation (2023) ...
  • Red Bull Failed to Give Wings (2016) ...
  • McDonald's 30-Cent Cheese Lawsuit. ...
  • Leonard v PepsiCo (1999) ...
  • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...
  • Pringles and VAT (UK)

What was the worst court case in history?

There's no single "worst" case, but Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) is often cited as the worst US Supreme Court decision for denying citizenship to Black people and nationalizing slavery, fueling the Civil War. Other contenders for "worst" include Plessy v. Ferguson (separate but equal), Buck v. Bell (forced sterilization), Korematsu v. U.S. (Japanese internment), and Citizens United v. FEC (corporate political spending). 

Can prosecutors be sued for misconduct?

“Prosecutorial immunity” is a judge-made doctrine that cloaks prosecutors in near-absolute immunity from suit. Under this doctrine, prosecutors cannot be sued for any actions related to their job as a prosecutor, no matter how egregious the behavior.

What should you never say to a judge?

When speaking to a judge, avoid disrespect (like calling them "Judge" instead of "Your Honor"), interruptions, emotional outbursts, slang, personal attacks, or guaranteeing outcomes; instead, be respectful, concise, truthful, and stick to the facts, only answering the question asked and maintaining a professional tone. Don't imply they aren't listening, threaten appeals, or make dismissive statements like "I didn't know," as courts expect responsibility and adherence to protocol. 

Who holds a judge accountable?

Judges are held accountable through a mix of internal judicial oversight (like Judicial Councils and the Judicial Conference for federal judges), ethics codes, public complaints, judicial review by higher courts, legislative action (like impeachment for federal judges), and sometimes state commissions for state judges, though accountability mechanisms, especially for federal judges with lifetime appointments, face challenges and calls for reform. 

When a judge doesn't like you?

What if I get a judge that doesn't like me? Unfortunately, you are stuck. The only way you can change a judge is if you recuse them but there has to be some sort of wrongdoing or bias that is shown and that's not always easy to do.