What factors does the court consider before awarding punitive damages?

Asked by: Juana Metz  |  Last update: January 2, 2023
Score: 4.3/5 (33 votes)

The deterrence justification for punitive damages is motivated by two objectives: (1) to deter the specific defendant in the case from repeating or continuing his, her, or its offensive behavior and (2) to deter, generally, other potential parties from committing similar offenses.

What three 3 Things Must a court consider in reviewing punitive damages?

To ensure that unconstitutional punishment is not imposed in the form of punitive damages, the Court has set forth three "guideposts" for courts to consider in reviewing punitive damages awards: "(1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct; (2) the disparity between the actual or potential harm ...

For what reason would a court of law award punitive damages in a lawsuit?

Punitive damages are awarded when the court wants to punish the responsible party for their outrageous conduct. These damages are also meant to prevent others from engaging in future similar conduct.

What are the elements of punitive damages?

In California, punitive damages are generally available, in non-breach of contract cases, when a plaintiff has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with “oppression, fraud, or malice[.]” Punitive damages are intended to punish, and thereby deter, wrongful acts.

In which circumstances are punitive damages typically awarded?

Punitive damages are considered punishment and are typically awarded at the court's discretion when the defendant's behavior is found to be especially harmful. Punitive damages are normally not awarded in the context of a breach of contract claim.

A Video Explaining how to Calculate and Award Punitive Damages

37 related questions found

What do most states use as a general guideline for punitive damages?

In most states, the jury is instructed to consider both objective and subjective factors. These factors include the reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct, the amount of punitive damages that would deter the defendant based on the defendant's wealth, and the nature of the plaintiff's injury.

What is one argument given against the awarding of punitive damages?

Simple Negligence

Thus, a defendant might challenge a punitive damages award by arguing that the theory under which the plaintiff prevailed does not support punitive damages.

How are punitive damages measured?

To determine the amount of punitive damages to award, the Book of Approved Jury Instructions (BAJI) states that the jury should consider: (1) The reprehensibility of the conduct of the defendant. (2) The defendant's financial condition and (3) the relationship to actual damages.

How are punitive damages calculated?

6 Factors That Determine Your Punitive Damages
  1. The nature of your injuries.
  2. The unreasonableness of the defendant's conduct.
  3. The comparative strength of the defendant to you.
  4. Your change in life following the event.
  5. Your compensatory damages.
  6. The defendant's resources.

Why are punitive damages awarded quizlet?

Why punitive damages? To punish a defendant and to deter others from similar conduct in the future.

What are the 3 types of damages?

Types of Damages
  • COMPENSATORY. Compensatory damages are generally the most identifiable and concrete type of damages. ...
  • GENERAL. General damages are sought in conjunction with compensatory damages. ...
  • PUNITIVE. Punitive damages are meant to punish a Defendant for particularly egregious conduct.

Which of the following is a main goal of punitive damages?

While the purpose of punitive damages is to punish the defendant — and set an example — rather than compensate the plaintiff, the plaintiff will still receive all or some of the damages awarded.

What is the purpose of punitive damages?

Punitive damages go beyond compensating the aggrieved party and are specifically designed to punish defendants whose conduct is considered grossly negligent or intentional. They are also called exemplary damages when they are intended to set an example to deter others from committing similar acts.

When should you ask for punitive damages?

As such, punitive damages are usually reserved for cases where the defendant's conduct is beyond merely negligent or intentional; the conduct must be reckless, malicious, fraudulent, wanton, outrageous, or otherwise more deserving of punishment in the eyes of the judge or jury.

What must the claimant prove in order to secure punitive damages from the insurer?

In many states, claimants must meet a higher burden of proof to succeed on a punitive damage claim, offering clear and convincing evidence that a defendant's conduct justifies such an award.

What are the three guideposts for the amount of punitive damages awarded?

These three "guideposts" include (1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendants conduct; (2) the reasonableness of the ratio between punitive damages awarded and the actual harm inflicted; and (3) the degree of comparability between the punitive damages awarded and authorized civil and criminal penalties.

How do you prove emotional distress?

To prove a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress in California a plaintiff must prove that:
  1. The defendant's conduct was outrageous,
  2. The conduct was either reckless or intended to cause emotional distress; and.
  3. As a result of the defendant's conduct the plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress.

What is the general ratio for a punitive damage to be awarded?

California Court of Appeal Finds That a 10:1 Ratio Between Punitive Damages and Compensatory Damages Awards Satisfies Due Process. A 10-to-1 ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages awards in an insurance bad faith case passes Constitutional muster.

Who receives the punitive damages?

Even though punitive damage awards are meant to punish the defendant and benefit society, not the plaintiff, punitive damage awards are paid to the plaintiff in a case.

What are the four elements to every successful tort case?

The Four Elements of a Tort
  • The accused had a duty, in most personal injury cases, to act in a way that did not cause you to become injured.
  • The accused committed a breach of that duty.
  • An injury occurred to you.
  • The breach of duty was the proximate cause of your injury.

How are compensatory damages calculated?

Add up the total replacement cost for your items. Add the other costs and fees that you have incurred in prosecuting the lawsuit, including your attorney fees, postage and filing fees. You can also include other losses for which you are entitled to compensation, such as loss of work or loss of lifestyle.

What is a criticism of high awards for punitive damages?

Critics of punitive damages believe that large monetary awards are unfair, unreasonable, and not productive for society. One of their central criticisms goes to the idea of punitive damages as "quasi-criminal" punishments.

How do you argue against punitive damages?

Another strategy to defeat or mitigate punitive damages when compensatory liability is found is to show that the defendant has remedied whatever caused the plaintiff's harm and/or that the defendant has already been punished for its conduct.

What are punitive damages quizlet?

What are punitive damages? Damages awarded that are intended to punish the defendant for conduct that is extreme and outrageous.

Are punitive damages unconstitutional?

California has the constitutional freedom to use punitive damages as a tool to protect the consuming public, not merely to punish a private wrong. The harm Nickerson suffered as the result of Stonebridge's conduct was not accidental, but the result of a deceitful practice designed to deny him his policy benefits.