What is a dissenting opinion?
Asked by: Newell Littel | Last update: April 24, 2026Score: 4.2/5 (35 votes)
A dissenting opinion is a formal statement by a judge who disagrees with the majority decision in a court case, outlining why they believe the ruling should have been different, offering alternative legal interpretations or highlighting concerns, and while not binding law, it can influence future rulings and legal debate.
What is the meaning of dissenting opinion?
A dissenting opinion refers to an opinion written by an appellate judge or Supreme Court Justice who disagrees with the majority opinion in a given case. A party who writes a dissenting opinion is said to dissent.
What does dissent mean simple?
Dissent means to disagree with or withhold approval from a majority opinion, decision, or belief, often formally expressed as a different viewpoint, especially in legal or political contexts like a judge writing a dissenting opinion or citizens opposing government policy. It signifies a difference of opinion or opposition, essentially saying "no" when others say "yes".
What best describes a dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court?
A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law, though they can sometimes be cited as a form of persuasive authority in subsequent cases when arguing that the court's holding should be limited or overturned.
What qualifies as dissent?
A dissent refers to at least one party's disagreement with the majority opinion. An appellate judge or Supreme Court Justice who writes an opinion opposing the holding is said to write a dissenting opinion.
What is a dissenting opinion?
What are the three types of dissent?
Professor Jeffrey Kassing (2011) divided dissent into three types: articulated, latent, and displaced.
What famous cases had strong dissents?
Famous U.S. Supreme Court cases with influential dissents include Plessy v. Ferguson (Harlan's "Our Constitution is color-blind" dissent), Dred Scott v. Sandford (Curtis's dissent), Olmstead v. United States (Brandeis's dissent on privacy), and Korematsu v. United States (Jackson's dissent against Japanese Internment), with Justices like RBG, Scalia, and Holmes also known for powerful dissents that often foreshadowed future legal shifts.
Can the president overturn a Supreme Court decision?
No, the President cannot directly overturn a Supreme Court decision; only the Court itself (through a new ruling), the Constitution (via amendment), or new legislation by Congress can overturn a major ruling, though Presidents can try to influence future decisions by appointing new justices or challenge rulings through appeals, and historically, some have selectively enforced or ignored certain rulings, as seen with Lincoln and the Dred Scott case.
What was the dissenting opinion in Trump v US?
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that granting immunity from prosecution would reshape the institution of the Presidency and risk permitting criminal conduct by presidents.
How often do judges write dissents?
There were dis- senting opinions in 62 percent of the cases in our sample. 5 We find that majority opinions are longer when there is a dissent and that dissents are rarely cited in either the courts of appeals or the Supreme Court.
What does it mean when a judge says I dissent?
Dissents in the Supreme Court are opinions submitted by justices who disagree with the majority ruling, reflecting differing legal interpretations and philosophies.
What are examples of dissent?
Dissent examples range from formal legal disagreements in court, like a judge writing a dissenting opinion, to public protests, boycotts, or even a single person questioning authority, such as a scientist challenging a theory or a citizen speaking out against a government policy, showing disagreement with majority opinion or established doctrines in politics, religion, or science.
What makes a dissenting opinion powerful?
Dissents serve as sentinels warning of shifts in power, legitimacy, and principle. They echo across time, influencing future legal thought and sometimes presaging changes in the law itself.
Who dissented in Trump v. Casa?
Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed a dissent which was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Sotomayor argued the government had avoided requesting a complete stay of the injunctions because doing so would require them to prove Executive Order 14160 was likely constitutional.
What are the benefits of dissent?
According to psychology professor and author of In Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business, Charlan Nemeth, just one dissenting voice provides these three benefits: Broadens our thinking, motivating us to be more flexible and consider more information, often from different sources.
Who appointed more judges, Trump or Obama?
While President Obama appointed more judges overall (around 330-334) across his two terms compared to Donald Trump's single term (around 226-245), Trump appointed a higher proportion of powerful appellate court judges and more Supreme Court justices (three vs. Obama's two), significantly shifting the courts' ideological balance, especially the circuit courts.
Why do judges write dissents?
A persuasive dissenting opinion may serve as the predicate for a different outcome in a future case involving the same issue. "A further benefit of writing separate opinions is that they provide competition for the majority opinion in its race for acceptance in the marketplace of ideas." Flanders, op.
Can the president change the number of Supreme Court justices?
No, the President cannot unilaterally change the number of Supreme Court Justices; that power belongs to Congress, which can pass a law (like the Judiciary Acts) to alter the size, and the President would then sign it, but the President cannot just add justices on their own. Congress sets the number of justices, and while historically it's been nine since 1869, they have the constitutional authority to change it through legislation, though doing so for purely political reasons (like "court packing") is controversial and has never succeeded, notes Stevens & Lee and NBC News.
Can a US President fire a Supreme Court judge?
No, a U.S. President cannot fire a Supreme Court Justice; justices have lifetime appointments and can only be removed through the impeachment and conviction process by Congress (House impeaches, Senate convicts) for "high crimes and misdemeanors," a process designed to ensure judicial independence.
Who has greater power than the President?
The Senate has exceptionally high authority, sometimes higher than the President or the House of Representatives. The Senate can try cases of impeachment, which can dismiss a President for misconduct.
Has any President ignored a Supreme Court ruling?
Yes, presidents have ignored or defied Supreme Court rulings, most famously Andrew Jackson with the Cherokee Nation (Trail of Tears) and Abraham Lincoln by suspending habeas corpus, but this is rare and often leads to constitutional crises, with recent instances involving defiance in deportation cases under the Trump administration. Other examples include governors defying rulings on segregation (Faubus, Barnett) and FDR's stance on military tribunals, highlighting ongoing tensions between executive power and judicial authority.
What is considered the worst Supreme Court case ever?
While subjective, Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) is widely considered the worst Supreme Court case ever for denying Black people citizenship, fueling slavery, and pushing the nation toward Civil War, with other notorious decisions including Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) (sanctioning segregation) and Korematsu v. United States (1944) (upholding Japanese internment). More recent controversial rulings often cited include Citizens United v. FEC (2010) (campaign finance) and Kelo v. New London (2005) (eminent domain).
What is the most ridiculous Court case?
20 of the Most Ridiculous Court Cases Ever (But They Really Happened!)
- Crocs Shrinking Lawsuit (2023) ...
- Subway Tuna Allegation (2023) ...
- Red Bull Failed to Give Wings (2016) ...
- McDonald's 30-Cent Cheese Lawsuit. ...
- Leonard v PepsiCo (1999) ...
- Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...
- Pringles and VAT (UK)
Who is the most respected Supreme Court justice?
John Marshall is one of the most influential justices to have served on the Supreme Court of the United States, if not the most influential.