What is Section 126k of the Evidence Act?

Asked by: Zena Runolfsson  |  Last update: May 29, 2026
Score: 4.3/5 (61 votes)

Section 126K of Australia's Evidence Act 1995 establishes journalist privilege, protecting journalists and their employers from being compelled to reveal an informant's identity if the journalist promised confidentiality, but this protection can be overturned by a court if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm and the public interest in a free press, requiring an application by a party to prove this balance.

What is Section 126 of the Evidence Act?

Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 provides that no barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil shall be permitted to disclose communications made by his client or advice given by him in the course of his employment except if there is an illegal purpose or showing a crime or fraud after commencement of his ...

What is the journalist privilege evidence?

Federal constitutional law . . . for the proposition that a reporter has a privilege to withhold relevant evidence in a civil case where that evidence will neither disclose a confidential source nor disclose material given by a known source in confidence.” Id.

Why might a journalist be most likely to refuse to testify and disclose information in court even when subpoenaed?

If a reporter is subpoenaed to testify or provide information in federal court, they can't protect the confidentiality of their source. A reporter often has no idea when making a promise to a source whether their reporting will be important to a court case, especially one in federal court.

What is Section 189 of the Evidence Act?

Section 189 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) outlines that a voir dire is to be used to determine questions such as whether: evidence should be admitted (whether in the exercise of a discretion or not), or. evidence can be used against a person, or. a witness is competent or compellable.

Indian Evidence Act 1872. Section 126(Professional communications)

36 related questions found

What is the 165 evidence Act?

The judge may,in order to discover or to obtain proper proof of relevant facts, ask any question he pleases, in any form, at any time, of any witness, or of the parties, about anx fact relevant or irrelevant ; and may order the production of any document or thing ; and neither the parties nor their agents shall be ...

What is the s140 of the evidence Act?

(1) In a civil proceeding, the court must find the case of a party proved if it is satisfied that the case has been proved on the balance of probabilities.

What must be proved for a person to win a libel case against a journalist?

Private Individuals: In order to win a libel lawsuit, private individuals need only prove that an article about them was libelous, and that it was published. But public officials who work in the local, state or federal government must also prove a story was published with something called “actual malice.”

What are journalists not allowed to do?

Relationship with freedom of the press

Non-free media may be prohibited from criticising the national government, serve as a de facto distributor of propaganda, and/or engage in self-censorship. Various other forms of censorship may restrict reporting on issues the government deems sensitive.

What is the best defense for a reporter accused of libel?

Within journalism, the most common defense against the charge of libel is truth. If a statement is truthful, then it does not matter if the plaintiff is harmed.

What are the 4 P's of journalism?

The four pillars of ethical journalism, according to the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), are: Seek Truth and Report It, Minimize Harm, Act Independently, and Be Accountable and Transparent. These principles guide journalists to provide accurate, fair, and responsible news, focusing on truth-seeking, compassion for subjects, freedom from bias, and public trust through admitting mistakes and engaging with the community. 

Can a reporter be sent to jail for refusing a judge's order to reveal the identity of his or her news source?

Back in 1972, the Supreme Court ruled that a journalist had no right to refuse testimony where he or she had witnessed criminal activity. The Court also since held that a journalist who fails to comply with a subpoena can be held in contempt of court and fined or even sent to jail.

What is the rule of evidence privilege?

In the law of evidence, a privilege is a rule of evidence that allows the holder of the privilege to refuse to disclose information or provide evidence about a certain subject or to bar such evidence from being disclosed or used in a judicial or other proceeding.

What is the 126 code for?

A "126 code" varies greatly by context, often meaning police need backup for a situation like a traffic stop or public disturbance, but can also refer to perjury penalties in California law, specific furnace error codes (like Carrier's overheating), or PayPal fraud filter triggers, and even relates to federal laws on cost-sharing payments or disability rights. To know what it means, you must identify the system (police, law, software, etc.). 

Which type of evidence is not admissible?

Hearsay evidence

Hearsay evidence is information provided outside of a court setting to someone involved in the trial. In most cases, judges don't allow hearsay evidence because the attorney for an opposing law team doesn't have an opportunity to cross-examine the person who provided the information.

What is article number 126?

Article 126 of Indian Constitution empowers the President to appoint an acting Chief Justice when the CJI is absent or unable to perform their duties. The provision ensures the uninterrupted functioning of the judiciary and bolsters the rule of law.

What are the 5 W's in journalism?

The Who, What, When, Where, Why of a Story. One of the best practices for writers is to follow "The 5Ws" guideline, by investigating the Who, What, Where, When and Why of a story. If you can't identify what makes your story unique and interesting, chances are nobody else will either.

What is RA 7079 all about?

AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF CAMPUS JOURNALISM AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

What not to say to a journalist?

5 things NOT to say to a journalist

  • “No comment.” Never say “no comment.” Even if you don't have anything you can share, explain why you're not able to share much now. ...
  • Don't repeat negative words or statements. ...
  • Providing personal opinions. ...
  • “Can we keep this off the record?” Unfortunately, it's not always a real thing.

What is the strongest defense in a libel case?

The best defense against a defamation case (really against most things) is the truth. Truth is an absolute defense to defamation – if your statement was true, it cannot be the grounds for a successful defamation claim against you.

What are the five things a successful libel plaintiff must prove?

The Five Essential Elements of a Defamation Claim

  • The Statement Must Identify You. ...
  • The Statement Must Be False. ...
  • The Statement Must Be Communicated to Others. ...
  • The Person Making the Statement Must Be At Fault. ...
  • The Statement Must Harm Your Reputation.

What is unfairly prejudicial evidence?

“Unfair prejudice” within its context means an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one. The rule does not enumerate surprise as a ground for exclusion, in this respect following Wigmore's view of the common law.

What is the 69 Evidence Act?

"69. If no such attesting witness can be found, or if the document purports to have been executed in the United Kingdom, it must be proved that the attestation of one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting, and that the signature of the person executing the document is in the handwriting of that person."

What is s84 of the Evidence Act?

84 Exclusion of admissions influenced by violence and certain other conduct. (b) a threat of conduct of that kind. (2) Subsection (1) only applies if the party against whom evidence of the admission is adduced has raised in the proceeding an issue about whether the admission or its making were so influenced.