What is stare decisis?

Asked by: Prof. Kylee Champlin  |  Last update: February 28, 2026
Score: 4.1/5 (41 votes)

Stare decisis (Latin for "to stand by things decided") is the legal principle that courts should follow precedents set by prior rulings in similar cases, promoting legal consistency, predictability, and stability, though higher courts can overturn precedent when necessary for justice or societal change. It involves vertical stare decisis (lower courts bound by higher courts) and horizontal stare decisis (courts following their own past decisions), with the U.S. Supreme Court setting binding precedent for most others.

What is the stare decisis in simple terms?

Stare decisis means “to stand by things decided” in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision.

What is stare decisis quizlet?

Stare decisis is a legal principle that requires courts to apply precedent. It assures that cases with indistinguishable situations and circumstances are handled in a consistent manner.

What is the best example of stare decisis?

The best example of stare decisis (Latin for "to stand by things decided") is when a court follows a precedent set in a prior, similar case to guide its current ruling, ensuring legal consistency, such as the Supreme Court overturning a state law that conflicts with its precedent in District of Columbia v. Heller, or when lower courts apply the Brown v. Board of Education ruling to decide school segregation cases. It's about judges adhering to established legal interpretations rather than creating entirely new law in every case. 

What is another word for stare decisis?

Another term for stare decisis is the doctrine of precedent, which means courts should follow past decisions (precedents) when deciding similar cases, ensuring legal consistency and predictability, with "precedent" itself being the key term for those prior rulings. 

Stare Decisis: What Is Stare Decisis? [No. 86]

19 related questions found

What happens if stare decisis is ignored?

If stare decisis continues to be ignored and cases are decided on biased, partisan lines, then the rule of law in the United States is at risk. 1. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

What are the two types of precedence?

The two main types of precedence, particularly in law and project management, are Binding vs. Persuasive (legal) and Vertical vs. Horizontal (legal/stare decisis), alongside task dependencies like Finish-to-Start (project management). Legally, binding precedent must be followed, while persuasive precedent can be considered, whereas vertically, lower courts follow higher courts, and horizontally, courts follow their own past rulings. In project management, precedence defines task order, like tasks needing to finish before others start (Finish-to-Start). 

Can stare decisis be overturned?

(precedent can be overruled if changes in society or in the law dictate that the values served by stare decisis yield in favor of a greater objective).

What is the most famous court case ever?

There's no single "most famous" case, but top contenders include Dred Scott v. Sandford (slavery/Civil War), Brown v. Board of Education (desegregation), Roe v. Wade (abortion rights), Miranda v. Arizona (rights of the accused), and the O.J. Simpson trial (media spectacle/criminal law), each famous for profound societal impact or massive public attention, shaping American law and culture.
 

Is stare decisis good or bad?

The doctrine of stare decisis famously instructs judges to respect past decisions even if they believe these decisions are wrong. Many believe stare decisis serves venerable values and bemoan its apparent demise in various apex courts around the world.

What are the benefits of stare decisis?

The stare decisis concept lessens the need for subsequent litigation and further saves the time and energy of the judiciary by preventing it from having to continually decide the same legal question or issue if it has already been decided in another case.

What is a quizlet definition?

Quizlet is a popular online learning tool and app that helps students study using digital flashcards, practice tests, and educational games, allowing users to create their own study sets or use millions of others on various subjects, making learning interactive, shareable, and accessible across devices. It converts information into various study modes like flashcards, "Learn," "Write," and "Spell" to help master material.
 

What is the definition of stare decisis in Black's law Dictionary?

“Stare decisis” is a shortened form of the Latin phrase “stare decisis et non quieta movere,” which Black's Law Dictionary defines as “To adhere to precedents, and not to unsettle things which are established.” It takes two forms: vertical stare decisis and horizontal stare decisis.

What is a precedent in simple terms?

A precedent is a past event, ruling, or decision that serves as an example or guide for how to handle similar situations in the future, especially in law, where judges follow prior rulings (stare decisis) for similar cases to ensure consistency. In simple terms, it's a standard set by something that came before, influencing subsequent actions or judgments. 

How do you use stare decisis in a sentence?

How to Use stare decisis in a Sentence

  1. But Thomas and Scalia differed in their approach to stare decisis – the law of precedent. ...
  2. In this sense, Roe can likewise be a good test of a nominee's views on stare decisis. ...
  3. But the third decision is stare decisis - - court precedent and how much the court respects that.

What is the doctrine of stare?

The doctrine of stare decisis, (which comes. from the Latin maxim, stare decisis et non. quieta movere) means one stands by (pre- vious) decisions and does not disturb set- tled points.

What is the stupidest court case?

We all know the most famous frivolous lawsuit story. Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's back in 1992 when she spilled hot coffee on herself. "But coffee is meant to be hot" we all cry. Dig a little deeper into the case however and it starts to look less frivolous.

Does Gen Z like true crime?

Yes, Gen Z loves true crime, with high consumption rates driven by social media (especially TikTok), a desire for control in an uncertain world, and curiosity about human psychology, using platforms like Netflix, YouTube, and podcasts for accessible, bite-sized, or in-depth storytelling. This generation engages with the genre for entertainment, to feel prepared, to gain closure from solved cases, and to explore complex motivations behind crimes, often becoming amateur sleuths online.
 

Can a state ignore the Supreme Court?

Ableman found that the Constitution gave the Supreme Court final authority to determine the extent and limits of federal power and that the states therefore do not have the power to nullify federal law. The Civil War put an end to most nullification attempts.

Can the president remove Supreme Court justices from office?

No, a President cannot remove a Supreme Court Justice; only Congress has the power to do so through the impeachment process (House impeaches, Senate convicts) for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," ensuring judicial independence and lifetime tenure ("good behavior") for Article III judges. 

Do judges have to follow stare decisis?

Summary: Scholars, judges, and lawyers commonly recognize that stare decisis, the rule that judges follow the rulings in previously decided court opinions, is the central norm underlying the American judiciary.

Who can supersede the Supreme Court?

Congress can influence and limit the judicial branch, and the judiciary can check Congress's powers. Legislative Branch's Checks on the Judicial Branch: Impeachment power: Congress can impeach and remove federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, for misconduct.

What is the paradox of precedent?

Precedent about precedent presents a paradox that gives it a unique status within our system of stare decisis because a court overruling precedent about precedent will not apply the stare decisis framework that the precedent about precedent established.

Can a lower court overrule a higher court?

Of course, vertical stare decisis (precedent as between decisions of higher and lower courts) is stronger than its horizontal counterpart (precedent as between decisions of the same court). That makes sense, given that a lower court can't overrule a higher court's precedent.

What is obiter dicta and ratio decidendi?

Obiter dicta are legal ideas or observations expressed by judges that have no bearing on the result of the case. Role. Ratio decidendi is a norm of law that the judge openly or implicitly treats as an essential step in reaching the decision.