What was the main debate over the ratification of the Constitution?
Asked by: Remington Hegmann | Last update: May 17, 2025Score: 4.6/5 (37 votes)
What was the debate over the ratification of the Constitution?
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights.
What were three arguments against ratification of the Constitution?
Several arguments were voiced repeatedly during the ratification debates: That the Convention had exceeded its authority in producing a new Constitution; That the Constitution established the basis for a monarchical regime; That the Constitution lacked explicit protections for individual and states rights.
What was the main argument between Federalists and Anti-Federalists?
Federalists believed that a stronger national government would improve relationships between states and help create, as the Constitution stated, a “more perfect union.” Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, worried that a federal government with more power would be prone to tyranny.
What was the main debate at the Constitutional Convention?
A central issue at the Convention was whether the federal government or the states would have more power. Many delegates believed that the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, but others feared that a strong federal government would oppress their citizens.
The CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION and Debates Over RATIFICATION [APUSH Review Unit 3 Topic 8] Period 3
What were the key debates during the drafting and ratification of the Constitution?
The major debates were over representation in Congress, the powers of the president, how to elect the president (Electoral College), slave trade, and a bill of rights. Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Washington.
What were the arguments against the U.S. Constitution?
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.
What was a federalist argument in support of the ratification of the Constitution?
Federalists defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.
What were the major arguments in support of the Constitution given by the Federalists?
The Federalist Party saw the Articles of Confederation as weak and indicative of the inevitable instability a nation will face without a strong centralized government. Thus, the party advocated heavily in favor of the Implied Powers of the President within the Constitution alongside Federal Supremacy.
What did the Federalists believe in?
The party favored centralization, federalism, modernization, industrialization, and protectionism. The Federalists called for a strong national government that promoted economic growth and fostered friendly relationships with Great Britain in opposition to Revolutionary France.
What was the biggest problem with the anti-federalist argument?
The Anti-Federalists feared that the new Constitution gave the national government too much power. And that this new government—led by a new group of distant, out-of-touch political elites—would: Seize all political power. Swallow up the states—the governments that were closest to the people themselves.
What were the 3 major issues at the Constitution?
Debates erupted over representation in Congress, over slavery, and over the new executive branch.
What was one argument against the ratification of the US Constitution Quizlet?
The primary reason Patrick Henry and George Mason opposed the ratification of the US Constitution was that it did not include a bill of rights. They feared that without a clearly defined set of individual rights established at the federal level that the states would not offer sufficient protection.
What was the primary goal of the Federalists?
The Federalist papers stressed the need for an adequate central government and argued that the republican form of government easily could be adapted to the large expanse of territory and widely divergent interests found in the United States.
What are the arguments against federalism?
THE DRAWBACKS OF FEDERALISM. Federalism also comes with drawbacks. Chief among them are economic disparities across states, race-to-the-bottom dynamics (i.e., states compete to attract business by lowering taxes and regulations), and the difficulty of taking action on issues of national importance.
What was the main goal of the Federalist Papers?
The Federalist Papers was a collection of essays written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton in 1788. The essays urged the ratification of the United States Constitution, which had been debated and drafted at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787.
What were the debates over the ratification of the Constitution?
As in any debate there were two sides, the Federalists who supported ratification and the Anti-Federalists who did not. We now know that the Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, and went into effect in 1789.
What was the main argument against ratification of the Constitution?
The Supremacy Clause generated significant controversy during debates over the Constitution's ratification. Anti-Federalist opponents of the Constitution argued that the Clause would make the national government overly powerful and infringe on state sovereignty.
Who were the main opponents of ratification of the Constitution?
The main opponents of the ratification of the Constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who feared a powerful national government that could lead to tyranny and advocated for stronger state rights. Prominent Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry and James Monroe.
What were the major arguments of Federalists in favor of the Constitution what were the major arguments of Anti-Federalists in opposition to the Constitution?
The Federalists contended that a stronger central government would provide a solid base from which New York could grow and prosper. The anti-Federalists clamored for a bill of rights and fought to preserve the autonomy of the state against federal encroachments.
How did the Federalists convince them to support ratification?
The promise that a bill of rights would be drafted for the Constitution persuaded delegates in many states to support ratification.
What is the main purpose of the US Constitution?
A chief aim of the Constitution as drafted by the Convention was to create a government with enough power to act on a national level, but without so much power that fundamental rights would be at risk.
Which of the following would be a reason the Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution?
Final answer:
The Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution due to the need for a stronger central government and a legislative branch that could make and enforce laws.
Why didn't the Federalists want a bill of rights?
In Federalist Paper No. 84, Alexander Hamilton warned that a bill of rights could even be dangerous, because defining certain rights vaguely would leave them subject to misinterpretation or violation, where previously no such power had existed. Moreover, some important rights would be left out and therefore endangered.
What were the arguments for the Constitution in the Federalist Papers?
The overarching argument of the Federalist Papers is that the Articles of Confederation were weak and ineffective, and that the proposed Constitution would remedy these problems by creating a stronger federal government without threatening the rights and freedoms of American citizens.