Which of the following was ruled by the Supreme Court as a result of the Miranda case quizlet?

What is the Miranda rule quizlet?

Right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you in the court of law, right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you prior to any questions at not cost to you.

What was the final outcome of the Miranda decision select one quizlet?

What was the final outcome of the Miranda decision? His conviction was overturned.

What was the result of the Miranda v. Arizona case?

In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution. Miranda v.

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision quizlet?

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision? Ernesto Miranda was found guilty on all counts.

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona 1966 )?

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Roe v Wade case of 1973 quizlet?

Court ruled with a 7-2 decision in 1973 for Jane Roe that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits states from "depriv[ing] any person of liberty without due process of law."

What ruling did the Supreme Court make regarding flag burning in Texas v Johnson quizlet?

in a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment. The Court found that Johnson's actions fell into the category of expressive conduct and had a distinctively political nature.

What is the Miranda warning quizlet?

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

Which state did Miranda Sue which resulted in the Supreme Court mandating the Miranda warnings?

officers in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Why did the Supreme Court expand the incorporation of the Bill of Rights?

Why did the Supreme Court expand the incorporation of the Bill of Rights? due process and equal protection under the law. the right of citizenship and equal protection.

What was the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v Baltimore in 1833?

In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution's Bill of Rights restricts only the powers of the federal government and not those of the state governments.

Which recent U.S. Supreme Court cases have affected Miranda warning requirements?

Why did the Supreme Court overturn Miranda's conviction?

Why did the Supreme Court overturn Miranda's conviction? The Court overturned Miranda's conviction because the police had not informed him of his rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendment: the right not to incriminate himself, as well as the right to have legal counsel assist him.

What was the ruling of the Supreme Court in Gideon v Wainwright?

Wainwright. On March 18, 1963, the United States Supreme Court announced that people accused of crimes have a right to an attorney even if they cannot afford one.

What was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in In re Gault quizlet?

Summarize the In re Gault Supreme Court decision in ~3 sentences. The judge committed 15-year-old Gault to Arizona's State Industrial School until he turned 21. The Supreme Court determined Gault was denied due process and overturned his sentence for allegedly making an obscene phone call.

Did Miranda win the case?

At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.

What is the Miranda ruling?

The Miranda rule, which the Supreme Court recognized as a constitutional right in its 1966 decision Miranda v. Arizona, requires that suspects be informed of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights "prior to interrogation" if their statements are to be used against them in court.

What does Miranda rule say?

The wording used when a person is read the Miranda Warning, also known as being 'Mirandized,' is clear and direct: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney.

Which of the following is part of the Miranda rule quizlet?

Which of the following is part of the Miranda rule? Arrested people have the right to remain silent.