Who has the authority to act as mediator or arbitrator?

Asked by: Oma Stokes  |  Last update: January 26, 2026
Score: 4.9/5 (35 votes)

Authority to mediate or arbitrate comes from agreement by the disputing parties or a court order, often requiring the individual to be a neutral, trained, and sometimes certified professional (like a former judge, lawyer, or industry expert) who assists in dispute resolution, with mediators guiding settlement and arbitrators making binding decisions, all selected based on expertise and trust.

What is the difference between a mediator and an arbitrator?

If a settlement cannot be reached, the parties are welcome to continue with the arbitration process. Unlike an arbitrator, a mediator has no power to decide a dispute. Rather, the mediator's role is to facilitate conversations between the parties to help them come to a resolution.

Who can act as a mediator?

A person who agrees to act as a mediator holds out to the parties an appropriate level of expertise and competence to effectively mediate. (a) Competence comprises appropriate knowledge and skills which would normally be acquired through training, education, and experience.

Which has the authority to render a decision, an arbitrator or a mediator?

Regardless of the nature of the hearing, however, the arbitrator ultimately has the authority to render a binding arbitration decision on those issues not resolved during the mediation portion of the procedure.

Who can act as an arbitrator?

India Code: Section Details. (1) A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. (2) Subject to sub-section (6), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators.

Arbitration Process in India Explained

35 related questions found

Can anybody be an arbitrator?

Individuals with legal, general business and accounting backgrounds are encouraged to apply. However, previous legal, arbitration, or securities experience is not required. Arbitrators are independent contractors and are not employees of FINRA. Develop skills and serve your community.

What power does an arbitrator have?

An arbitrator is an independent decision‑maker appointed by the parties to resolve a commercial dispute outside of court. Think of an arbitrator as a private judge: they hear evidence and arguments, apply the law, and deliver a binding decision (called an “award”).

Who can serve as an arbitrator?

Arbitrators are usually lawyers, business professionals, or retired judges with expertise in a particular field. As impartial third parties, they hear and decide disputes between opposing parties. Arbitrators may work alone or on a panel with other arbitrators.

Who ultimately has the power to resolve cases in mediation?

Mediation is different from other forms of dispute resolution in that the parties participate voluntarily, and the mediator has no authority to make a decision. The decision-making power rests in the hands of the parties.

What is the golden rule of mediation?

The "Golden Rule of Mediation" is to "Treat others as you would like to be treated," emphasizing mutual respect, active listening, empathy, and good faith to shift focus from winning to collaborative problem-solving. It means acknowledging other perspectives, even if disagreeing, to lower emotions, build trust, and find common ground, allowing for fair and constructive agreements rather than punishment. 

Who acts as a mediator?

A mediator is a trained professional who acts as a neutral facilitator during the mediation process. Mediation is a procedure where parties discuss disputes and the mediator—the impartial third party—helps them reach an agreeable settlement.

What are the 4 types of mediators?

The four main types of mediation styles focus on how involved the mediator is in guiding the resolution: Facilitative (helps parties talk and find their own solution), Evaluative (gives opinions and predicts outcomes, often used in legal settings), Transformative (focuses on empowering parties and improving relationships), and sometimes Narrative (uses storytelling to reframe conflict) or Transactional (focused on quick deals). These styles range from low intervention (facilitative/transformative) to high intervention (evaluative). 

Can a lawyer act as a mediator?

Service as a third-party neutral may include service as an arbitrator, a mediator or in such other capacity as will enable the lawyer to assist the parties to resolve the matter.

Who chooses mediation or arbitration?

Who chooses the mediator (or arbitrator)? The court will assign a lawyer with experience in family law to be your mediator or arbitrator. The attorney assigned to your case may ask questions or make suggestions. The attorney will be neutral.

Can a judge act as a mediator?

A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions apart from the judge's official duties unless expressly authorized by law.

Is a lawyer an arbitrator?

Yes, numerous arbitrators are qualified lawyers, but when working as an arbitrator, they are impartial and can't act on behalf of either side.

Can a judge overrule a mediation agreement?

If the judge finds that any part of the mediated agreement is unfair, illegal, or not in the child's best interests, they can reject the decisions you and your spouse have made with your mediator's guidance, in part or in whole, and make a different ruling.

What are the 4 C's of mediation?

The "4 Cs of Mediation" refer to different frameworks highlighting key benefits, with common versions including Cost-effectiveness, Confidentiality, Control, and Creativity (beneficial for parties) or Candor, Creativity, Courage, and Collaboration/Cooperation (focusing on mediator approach). Essentially, they capture why mediation works: it's cheaper, private, empowering, encourages novel solutions, and fosters open communication for better outcomes than traditional litigation.
 

What should you not say in mediation?

In mediation, you should avoid threats, ultimatums, accusations, and insults, as these derail collaboration; don't lie or exaggerate, as it destroys credibility; and steer clear of rigid demands or focusing on past blame instead of future solutions, to keep the process constructive and focused on finding common ground for a fair resolution. 

Who cannot be appointed as arbitrator?

Retired or working members were ineligible to be appointed as arbitrators according to Sec. 12(5) read along with the 7th Schedule of the Act. The General Manager is ineligible to be an arbitrator himself. Therefore, he could not appoint another person to be an arbitrator.

Are an arbitrator and mediator the same?

The main distinction between the two is who makes the final decision. With mediation, the final decision is a reached agreement between the two conflicting parties, while arbitration calls on an arbitrator to analyze the case details and reach a verdict.

Can a non-lawyer be an arbitrator?

In many states, however, non-attorneys can also become arbitrators so long as they have relevant experience in dispute resolution. Disputes undergoing arbitration can be overseen by either a single arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.

What cannot be settled by arbitration?

Disputes that cannot be resolved through arbitration

  • Criminal offences.
  • Matrimonial disputes.
  • Guardianship matters.
  • Insolvency petitions.
  • Testamentary suits.
  • Trust disputes.
  • Labour and industrial disputes.
  • Tenancy and eviction matters governed by rent control statutes.

Can an arbitrator be removed by court?

Removal of Arbitrator in India

If a controversy remains concerning any of the grounds referred to inclause (a) of sub-section (1), a party may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, apply to the Court to decide on the termination of the mandate.

What are the three types of arbitration?

The three main categories of arbitration are often described by their administration and enforceability: Institutional (managed by an organization), Ad-Hoc (self-managed by parties), and Judicial/Court-Ordered (mandated by a court for specific cases), with key types also distinguished by Binding (final decision) versus Non-Binding (advisory) outcomes. Other common distinctions include Domestic (within a country) vs. International (cross-border) and variations like Fast-Track, High-Low, or Med-Arb.