Can a jury change their mind after a verdict?

Asked by: Dr. Joshuah Hill  |  Last update: January 31, 2026
Score: 4.3/5 (73 votes)

Generally, once a jury delivers its verdict in open court and it's officially accepted, they generally can't just "change their mind" later, but a juror can dissent before the verdict is official, potentially leading to a hung jury and mistrial, or a judge might send them back to deliberate if one juror suddenly shifts, but a verdict is usually final for that trial unless juror misconduct or legal errors are discovered, which can lead to overturning it, but not typically just by a juror having a change of heart after it's sealed.

Has a judge ever overrule a jury verdict?

Sometimes. In civil cases, a judge can overturn a jury's verdict if the evidence is so one-sided that no reasonable jury could have ruled in the verdict-winner's favor. The traditional name for this procedure is Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or JNOV.

Can a juror change their verdict?

open court a juror will change his or her mind and verdict. When this happens a judge is presented with a dilemma. The judge may either reject the verdict and send the jury back for further deliberations, or declare a mistrial.

What are two things jurors should never do?

Jurors should never discuss the case with anyone outside the jury (including family/friends) or conduct their own investigation, like visiting the scene or looking up info online, as the verdict must be based solely on courtroom evidence; these actions risk introducing bias and jeopardizing the trial's fairness. Another critical "never" is to decide by chance, such as by flipping coins, which makes a verdict illegal.
 

Can a judge go back and change his ruling?

Judges can change prior rulings in certain circumstances. That usually happens when a party makes a motion for reargument based on an obvious mistake in the original ruling.

Can A Jury's Verdict Be Changed?

43 related questions found

Can a judge reduce a jury's award?

Changing the Amount the Jury Awarded

If an award has no evidentiary support, it can be altered—lowered—or even raised, if the award was insufficient.

Which of the following may cause a case to be dismissed?

Procedural Errors

Discovery violations, speedy trial violations, improper grand jury proceedings, or failure to follow required court procedures all provide grounds for dismissal. Courts enforce procedural rules to ensure fair processes and protect the rights of the defendant.

What annoys judges?

Not following the judges rules and orders. Not being prepared for trial or hearing. Being late for trial or hearings. All of these shows a lack of respect for the court and judges really don't like it.

What is the hardest case to win in court?

The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, like crimes against children or sexual assault, where jurors struggle with bias; complex, voluminous evidence, such as white-collar fraud; and defenses that challenge societal norms, like an insanity plea, which faces high scrutiny and conflicting expert testimony. Cases with weak physical evidence, uncooperative witnesses (like in sex crimes), or those involving unpopular defendants (e.g., child abusers) are particularly challenging for defense attorneys.
 

What is the best excuse to avoid jury duty?

The best ways to get out of jury duty involve seeking official exemptions for valid reasons like age (over 70/75), medical conditions (with a doctor's note), primary childcare (under 6), or financial hardship (demonstrable income loss), or requesting a deferral online or by mail with supporting documents. During selection (voir dire), be honest about biases or situations (like family tragedy, travel) that prevent impartiality, as attorneys often excuse jurors who openly struggle with fairness, but avoid outright lying, which can backfire. 

What if one juror disagrees?

If one juror disagrees in a criminal trial, it often leads to a hung jury (deadlocked jury) and a mistrial, meaning no verdict is reached and the prosecutor might retry the case or drop charges, but in some states (like Oregon historically), a non-unanimous vote could still convict, although federal cases and most states require unanimous verdicts for criminal convictions. In civil cases, requirements vary by state, but often fewer than 12 jurors agree, and some states allow non-unanimous verdicts, but a complete deadlock still results in a mistrial. 

Is it better to plead not guilty or guilty?

It's generally better to plead not guilty at your first court appearance to preserve your rights, discover the prosecution's evidence, and allow your attorney time to negotiate for lesser charges or a better deal; pleading guilty immediately surrenders your power to bargain and results in a conviction and criminal record, though a guilty plea might be considered later after consultation with a lawyer or if the evidence is overwhelming and a plea deal offers significant benefits, like avoiding harsher penalties. 

Who is more powerful, a judge or a jury?

Moreover, judges' fact-finding decisions are typically framed as “norm enforcement” and assumed to be more rational and objective than those of jurors.

How often is the jury wrong?

The identification error is similarly one-sided, always. From the observed agreement rates, the probability of a correct verdict by the jury is estimated at 87% for the NCSC cases and 89% for the Kalven-Zeisel cases. Those accuracy rates correspond to error rates of 1 in 8 and 1 in 9, respectively.

Can a jury refuse to convict?

Jury nullification occurs when jurors refuse to convict a defendant despite believing the State has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jurors may do this because they believe the law is unjust, too harsh, or that a conviction would produce an unfair result.

Can a judge throw out a guilty verdict?

A judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) is a judgment by the trial judge after a jury has issued a verdict, setting aside the jury's verdict and entering a judgment in favor of the losing party without a new trial.

What is the stupidest court case?

We all know the most famous frivolous lawsuit story. Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's back in 1992 when she spilled hot coffee on herself. "But coffee is meant to be hot" we all cry. Dig a little deeper into the case however and it starts to look less frivolous.

Which lawyer wins most cases?

There's no single lawyer universally recognized for the most cases won, as records are hard to track and definitions vary, but Gerry Spence is famous for never losing a criminal case and a long civil win streak (until 2010), while Guyanese lawyer Sir Lionel Luckhoo holds a Guinness World Record for 245 successive murder acquittals, making them top contenders for different aspects of "most wins". 

Has anyone ever won a case without a lawyer?

Yes, people absolutely win cases without lawyers (acting pro se), but it's significantly harder and less common, especially in complex criminal or civil cases, as courts hold self-represented individuals to the same standards as attorneys, requiring deep legal knowledge and courtroom skill. Successful pro se litigants often handle simpler matters like small claims, name changes, or uncontested divorces, though notable cases exist where individuals like Edward Lawson won Supreme Court battles, and others have won murder trials, proving it's possible with extensive preparation and understanding of weak points in the opposing case. 

What not to tell a judge?

You should not say anything sarcastic, interrupt the judge, lie, use slang, make personal attacks on others, guarantee outcomes, or speak about things not relevant to the case; instead, remain respectful, address the judge as "Your Honor," answer only the question asked, and be direct and truthful to maintain credibility. 

Who is the kindest judge?

The show of love and support for the beloved Judge Frank Caprio, overwhelming. This proves that kindness and compassion especially in the courtroom go a long way. He was the judge of all people.

What color do judges like to see in court?

Judges generally prefer neutral, conservative colors like navy, gray, black, and white, as these convey seriousness, respect, and professionalism, avoiding distractions in a formal court setting; bright colors, bold patterns, and overly casual attire should be avoided to show you're taking the proceedings seriously. While some suggest lighter, muted tones (like light blue) might leave a favorable impression, the key is sobriety and fitting in, not standing out.
 

What is the most popular reason that cases get dismissed?

The most common reasons cases get dismissed involve insufficient evidence for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and violations of the defendant's constitutional rights (like illegal searches or seizures), making key evidence inadmissible, alongside issues like witness unavailability, procedural errors, or prosecutorial discretion where charges are dropped due to lack of interest or resources, especially in criminal matters. In civil cases, settlements often lead to dismissal before trial. 

What are 5 fair reasons for dismissal?

The five fair reasons for dismissal under UK employment law are Conduct, Capability/Qualifications, Redundancy, Breach of a Statutory Duty/Restriction, and Some Other Substantial Reason (SOSR), each requiring a fair process, like investigation, warnings, and consultation, to avoid unfair dismissal claims. These reasons cover employee behavior, inability to do the job (skill/health), role elimination, legal constraints, and other significant business needs. 

Do prosecutors ever drop charges?

A Violation of Your Rights Could Lead to Dropped Charges

As new evidence about your case comes to light, the prosecutor may reevaluate whether they can win a conviction and trial and may decide to drop charges.