Is Hadley V. Baxendale still good law?

Asked by: Dr. Jonathon Hill PhD  |  Last update: February 4, 2026
Score: 4.4/5 (45 votes)

Yes, the core principle of Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) is still fundamental to contract law, establishing that damages for breach must be reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting, but the application and nuances have evolved, with modern interpretations focusing on the degree of knowledge and foreseeability, making it a bedrock rule still widely studied and applied in common law jurisdictions, though with some judicial debate and refinement over time.

Who won in Hadley vs Baxendale?

Judgment. The Court of Exchequer, led by Baron Sir Edward Hall Alderson, declined to allow Hadley to recover lost profits, holding that Baxendale could be held liable only for losses that were generally foreseeable, or if Hadley had mentioned his special circumstances in advance.

What is the practical law of Hadley v. Baxendale?

Traditionally, the courts applied the rule in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341 to determine whether a loss is too remote, by distinguishing between: Losses that "may fairly and reasonably be considered [as] arising naturally, that is according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself".

What is the conclusion of the contract law?

Conclusion of any contract involves the meeting of the essential conditions required by the law for the validity of the contract: the capacity to contract; the parties' consent; a determined and licit object; a licit and moral cause (art. 1179 of The Civil Code).

What are the indirect damages of Hadley v. Baxendale?

In 1854 Hadley v Baxendale established two types of recoverable losses for breach of contract: direct losses: losses arising naturally/in the usual course of things, and. indirect losses: losses arising from some special circumstances that the defaulting party knew of at the time of entering into the contract.

Hadley v. Baxendale Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

30 related questions found

What are the 4 types of damages in law?

Let's embark on a journey through the four main types of damages: compensatory, punitive, nominal, and liquidated damages. Each serves a unique purpose and plays a distinct role in legal proceedings.

What does indirect damage mean?

Indirect damage loss is loss that results from direct damage to property—for example, loss of income and increased expenses resulting from the insured's inability to use the damaged property while it is being repaired or replaced.

What are the three main rules in contract law?

Understanding the 3 elements of contract law is crucial for anyone involved in business transactions. At their core, these elements are: offer, acceptance, and consideration.

What is considered a conclusion of law?

Conclusion of law refers to a decision made by a judge regarding a question of law. A conclusion of law determines what laws and how the laws apply to a particular case. These decisions often determine the outcome of a case, and they are usually the basis for review on appeal.

What are three reasons why a contract would end?

Reasons for Terminating a Contract

  • Illegality. If either party signed the contract under coercion or the contract terms break local or federal law, then the contract was never valid to begin with. ...
  • Breach of Contract. ...
  • Poor Performance. ...
  • Mutual Desire to Terminate. ...
  • Automatic Termination.

Can indirect damages be recovered?

Indirect loss

In some parts of the world, losses can be recovered even if they are not 'direct', as long as the contract does not expressly exclude this and the circumstances to which the losses relate has been considered by the parties in advance.

What is the critical analysis of Hadley v. Baxendale?

Hadley v. Baxendale states that the non-breaching party can only claim consequential damages if both parties to the contract were aware of the possibility of such losses. Consequences rule is based on the knowledge of parties at time of contract and reasonable man's standard. This is important to keep in mind.

What is the principle of Hadley v. Baxendale?

case of Hadley v Baxendale from 1854. That case established that loss caused by a breach of contract would be recoverable if the loss either: arose naturally (i.e. according to the usual course of things) from the breach (the 'first limb'); or.

What is the conclusion of consideration in contract law?

Conclusion. Consideration plays a central role in the creation of enforceable contracts. They're the key elements distinguishing a binding agreement from mere promises or gratuitous arrangements. Understanding the significance and implications of consideration is essential for parties entering contractual relationships ...

What is foreseeability in contract law?

Foreseeability asks how likely it was that a person could have anticipated the potential or actual results of their actions. This is a question in contract and tort law.

What is the holding in Hadley v Baxendale?

Hadley v. Baxendale held that the measure of consequential damages in a breach of contract case shall only consist of the damages that arise naturally from the breach, or those which both parties would have seen as reasonably certain to occur at the time the contract was formed.

What is a good conclusion ending?

A conclusion is the final piece of writing in a research paper, essay, or article that summarizes the entire work. A good conclusion will wrap up your final thoughts and main points, combining all pertinent information with an emotional appeal for an ending statement that resonates with your readers.

What is the word for ending a law?

A repeal (O.F. rapel, modern rappel, from rapeler, rappeler, revoke, re and appeler, appeal) is the removal or reversal of a law.

What is a closing argument in law?

Closing argument is the lawyer's final opportunity in a trial to tell the judge and/or jury why they should win the case. They do so by explaining how the evidence supports their theory of the case, and by clarifying for the jury any issues that they must resolve in order to render a verdict.

What are the 3 C's of a contract?

Today, we're diving into the core components that make up a legally binding contract, often referred to as the 3 C's: Capacity, Consent, and Consideration. Understanding these key elements can help you navigate legal agreements with confidence and clarity.

How to legally tell someone to stop contacting you?

What to Do If Someone Is Harassing You

  1. Tell Them to Stop.
  2. Send a Cease and Desist Letter.
  3. File a Police Report or call 911.
  4. Get a Restraining Order.
  5. Keep Detailed Records.

What are the 3 P's of a contract?

The Statute of Frauds and Canadian jurisprudence require that for any contract of real property to be enforceable, it must contain an agreement with respect to three essential elements knowns as the 3 P's: parties, property and price.

How are consequential damages proven in court?

To recover consequential damages in a lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that the damages were a foreseeable result of the breach and that the actual amount of the damages can be established with reasonable certainty. This often involves demonstrating how the breach specifically caused the subsequent financial losses.

What counts as direct damage?

Direct damage or burn refers to a spell or ability that deals damage to a target player, creature or planeswalker. That is, not through combat, but by other means.

What are the four types of damages?

Four Types of Damages Available in a Breach of Contract

  • Compensatory damages. Compensatory damages aim to restore the party who did NOT breach the contract back to the position they would have been in if the other party had held up their end of the deal as promised.
  • Punitive damages. ...
  • Nominal damages. ...
  • Liquidated damages.