What are the rules for cross-examination questions?

Asked by: Dr. Davonte Gutkowski II  |  Last update: March 7, 2025
Score: 4.3/5 (66 votes)

Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination. Opposing counsel may object to certain questions asked on cross-examination if the questions violate the state's laws on evidence or if they relate to matters not discussed during direct examination.

What are 3 rules for composing cross-examination questions?

Prior To Asking Cross Examination Questions:
  • Examine every document, transcript, email, and writing.
  • List the available evidence on every subject and cross reference each source.
  • Prepare detailed sequences of questions for each fact to be proven.

What are the 10 rules for cross-examination?

  • Be Brief. Be brief, short and succinct. ...
  • Use Plain Words. The jury can understand short questions and plain words. ...
  • Use Only Leading Questions. The law forbids questions on direct examination that suggest the answer. ...
  • Be Prepared. ...
  • Listen. ...
  • Do Not Quarrel. ...
  • Avoid Repetition. ...
  • Disallow Witness Explanation.

What questions are allowed in cross-examination?

What you can about ask during cross-examination. When cross-examining the other side's witness, you can only ask about the subjects that the plaintiff's attorney asked the witness about in direct examination. The legal term for this is the scope of direct examination.

What is the golden rule of cross-examination?

Preparation is the golden rule of cross-examination. The most effective cross is not random or casual but strategically planned to support your theory of the case. The first step is to prepare a theory of your case. The questions you ask on cross-examination should be consistent with your theory.

Easy (and Effective) Cross Examination Technique!

30 related questions found

What not to say during cross-examination?

Other 'don'ts' are not to insist on yes or no answers; not to create the opportunity for ruinous redirect examination; not to argue; not to object to the judge's questions; not to say, 'Remember you are under oath;' and not to be baited by the opposing attorney.

What are the limits of cross-examination?

Cross-examination should not go beyond the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the witness's credibility. The court may allow inquiry into additional matters as if on direct examination. (2) when a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.

What is the format for cross-examination questions?

A cross- examination question should be very pointed and requires only a one-word answer, preferably “yes” or “no.” The questions that you ask on cross-examination have to be related, in some way, to the issues that the witness talked about during direct examination.

What objections can you make during cross-examination?

You can object if you think the other side's evidence, witness testimony, or question should not be allowed. The rules for what is allowed in court are in the evidence code. If a judge agrees with your objection, the evidence or testimony won't be part of the official court record and can't be used to decide your case.

What are three things to keep in mind during a cross-examination?

Thankfully, there are things lawyers can do before and during a cross-examination to increase the chances it will be effective.
  • Establish Your Goals for Each Witness. ...
  • Structure Your Questions to Box Witnesses In. ...
  • Strategically Use Constructive & Deconstructive Cross-Examination. ...
  • Know Witnesses' Prior Testimony Inside & Out.

What is the first rule of cross-examination?

The first rule of cross-examination is that there are no absolute rules of cross-examination. There are merely guidelines and suggestions. Every cross-examination is different, and has to be approached with flexibility.

Can you present evidence during cross-examination?

That party may call witnesses or introduce exhibits into evidence. This is primarily done by calling witnesses to the stand and asking them questions-"direct examination." The opposition may also introduce evidence, through cross-examination or the introduction of exhibits during cross-examination.

Can a judge stop a cross-examination?

Because the witness may be hostile and uncooperative, courts generally permit leading questions throughout cross-examination; 2' however, the trial judge has discretion to stop an interrogation that appears to be eliciting unreliable or distorted evidence.

Can you ask hypothetical questions during cross-examination?

If utilized properly, the use of a hypothetical on cross will allow you to either undermine the credibility of the opposing expert or allow you to make the opposing expert your own witness and present opinion evidence which supports your position in the case.

What does hearsay mean in court?

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts, which is then offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter. The problem with hearsay is that when the person being quoted is not present, it becomes impossible to establish credibility.

How long should cross-examination be?

The overwhelming majority of witnesses can be cross-examined in 30 minutes or less even in very complicated cases. Effective cross-examination makes a point quickly and keeps the jury engaged from the moment you ask your first question until you pass the witness for re-direct.

What is an improper opinion?

Three kinds of opinions are improper in all situations -- speculation without facts, legal conclusions, and opinions about the credibility of witnesses.

What is an example of irrelevant evidence?

Irrelevant evidence is commonly objected to and disallowed at trial. For example, in a personal injury case, the insurance company may attempt to dig up unfavorable information about claimants in order to make the claimant appear in a negative light. This is especially true if the claimant has a criminal background.

Can you be argumentative on cross-examination?

More information An attorney shall not ask argumentative questions. Comment: An argumentative question typically occurs on crossexamination when the attorney asks the witness to agree to a particular interpretation or characterization of the evidence, as opposed to a particular fact.

What is an example of a cross-examine question?

Sample Questions for Witnesses

What did you witness? What was the date, time and duration of the incident or behavior you witnessed? Where did it happen? Who was involved?

What questions do judges ask in court?

Questions a judge might ask
  • Can the prosecutor present the charges? ...
  • What evidence does the prosecution have against the defendant? ...
  • Is the evidence legally obtained and admissible? ...
  • Does the evidence establish probable cause? ...
  • Does the defense wish to cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses?

Can you ask open-ended questions on cross-examination?

Always ask yourself: Is it even necessary to cross-examine this witness? Never ask open-ended questions. Ask only questions you already know the answer to, because you have deposed the witness. Never ask that “one questions too many.”

What are the leading questions during cross-examination?

In general, leading questions are not allowed during the direct examination of a witness and. If leading questions are asked during trial , it may result in the opposing attorney making an objection , which a judge is likely to sustain . However, leading questions are allowed on the cross-examination of a witness.

How to introduce evidence on cross-examination?

How to admit exhibits into evidence at a trial
  1. Show your exhibit to the other side and mark it. ...
  2. Have your witness identify your exhibits. ...
  3. Show the witness has first-hand knowledge of the exhibit. ...
  4. Ask the judge to admit the exhibit as evidence.

What is cross-examination law?

Cross-examination gives the opposing party an opportunity to point out the weaknesses of a witness's testimony , like holes in their story or a lack of credibility .