What best describes Baker V Carr?
Asked by: Wilhelmine Funk | Last update: February 1, 2026Score: 4.9/5 (16 votes)
Baker v. Carr (1962) is a landmark Supreme Court case that held federal courts can hear redistricting cases, establishing that legislative apportionment issues are not automatically "political questions" outside judicial review, and that unequal districts violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the "one person, one vote" principle by requiring states to redraw districts to reflect population changes. It reversed prior rulings, allowing federal courts to intervene in state malapportionment issues, ensuring fairer representation, especially for growing urban areas.
Which of the following best describes Baker vs Carr?
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
What is the main idea of Baker v. Carr?
The decision opened the door to lawsuits over legislative apportionment in other states, many of which alleged that state legislatures had failed to reapportion districts to reflect growing urban populations, thereby giving undue political influence to voters in rural areas.
What was the result of Baker versus Carr?
Summary. In the 6-2 majority opinion, the Supreme Court held that questions of legislative apportionment were justiciable. In his majority opinion, Justice William Brennan cited previous examples where the Court corrected state administration of laws that violated the rights of its citizens.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
The Fourteenth Amendment addresses a variety of issues concerning citizenship and citizens' rights "Equal protection of the laws". As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.
Baker v. Carr Explained: Gerrymandering #APGOV #SupremeCourt #Redistricting
What was the final decision in Baker v Carr?
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
What 1969 event became the most dramatic action taken by militant American Indians in the United States?
The occupation of Alcatraz Island is one of the most significant Red Power Movement actions, acting as a catalyst for the movement as a whole. On November 20, 1969, a group of American Indian activists under the name “Indians of All Tribes” occupied Alcatraz, an island in the San Francisco bay.
What impact does Baker v. Carr have today?
Baker v. Carr opened the door to judicial review of the redistricting process, prompted a cascade of subsequent lawsuits, and sent shockwaves through the redistricting community.
What did the Baker decision say you could successfully do?
The Baker decision established that redistricting issues could be subject to judicial review, allowing courts to intervene in cases of extreme partisan gerrymandering.
Why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of Baker?
The reason and motive for the baker's refusal were based on his sincere religious beliefs and convictions. The Court's precedents make clear that the baker, in his capacity as the owner of a business serving the public, might have his right to the free exercise of religion limited by generally applicable laws.
Which amendment to the constitution is most closely related to Baker v. Carr?
The majority decision in Baker v. Carr declared apportionment as justiciable (able to be ruled upon by a federal court) under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.
Which of the following accurately describes the composition of a congressional?
The accurate description of the composition of congressional committees is: Committees are organized by the majority party to maintain control of the policy-making process. This question focuses on understanding the fundamental structure and purpose of congressional committees in the United States.
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of Baker v Carr 1961 and Shaw v Reno (1993)?
The correct comparison is that Baker v. Carr established the "one-person, one-vote" doctrine, while Shaw v. Reno prohibited racially gerrymandered districts.
What is the intent of the Baker Act?
What is the Baker Act? The Florida Mental Health Act, commonly referred to as the Baker Act, focuses on crisis services for individuals with mental illness, much like an emergency department is for individuals experiencing a medical emergency.
Who wrote Baker V Carr?
Although Warren presided over a slew of cases that affected everything from the criminal justice system to racial equality, he called Baker the most important case of his career. William Brennan, Jr. (April 25, 1906 – July 24, 1997) was the Supreme Court justice (1956 – 1990) who wrote the decision in Baker.
Who can reverse the judgement of the Supreme Court?
A Supreme Court decision can be overturned by another Supreme Court ruling (a new case), a Constitutional Amendment, or if the ruling interpreted a federal statute, by Congress passing a new law. While the President can't overturn a decision directly, they influence future courts through appointments, and Congress can pass legislation to clarify or change laws interpreted by the Court.
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr?
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr (1962)? The redistricting of state legislative districts is justiciable by the Federal Courts.
How was the case of Baker v. Carr crucial to representation of US citizens?
The role of urban-rural conflict in Baker v. Carr meant that the conflict ultimately influenced how America votes. Baker v. Carr provided a profoundly important precedent in that it gave courts a "justiciable constitutional cause of action in which the appellants [in the case] are entitled to a trial and decision."
What as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr courts can require states to?
Sims, when the Court articulated the principle of "one person, one vote" that would require many states to redraw the lines of their electoral districts and amend their constitutions. This applies to all states with bicameral legislatures.
Which event was the most immediate result of the American government's response to the Plains Indians' resistance to western expansion of the United States?
The Battle of the Little Bighorn, known to the Lakota and other Plains Indians as the Battle of the Greasy Grass, and commonly referred to as Custer's Last Stand, was an armed engagement between combined forces of the Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes and the 7th Cavalry Regiment of the United States ...
Which was the main cause of conflict between Native Americans and settlers?
Land disputes were the most important cause of conflict between Native Americans and Europeans during the colonial period. Starting with the English settlement at Jamestown, English settlers claimed land that belonged to Native Americans (the Powhatan were the most powerful tribe in Virginia around that time).
How did civil rights activists change their strategies and goals in the 1960s and 1970s?
After years of nonviolent protests and civil disobedience campaigns, the civil rights movement achieved many of its legislative goals in the 1960s, during which it secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
What was the result of Baker versus Carr?
Summary. In the 6-2 majority opinion, the Supreme Court held that questions of legislative apportionment were justiciable. In his majority opinion, Justice William Brennan cited previous examples where the Court corrected state administration of laws that violated the rights of its citizens.
What was the significant ruling of the Baker Supreme Court case?
Cases about apportionment could now be heard by the Supreme Court. The ruling in Baker v. Carr (1962) was pivotal because it established that cases involving legislative apportionment could be heard by federal courts.
What was the overall issue being brought to the Supreme Court in Baker v. Carr?
Baker v. Carr involved a claim that the Tennessee legislature had failed to reapportion the state's legislative districts in accordance with the state constitution.