What happened in the New Jersey V-TLO case?
Asked by: Dr. Monty Braun III | Last update: February 3, 2025Score: 4.7/5 (63 votes)
What happened in the New Jersey V TLO case Quizlet?
On appeal, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed, holding that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to searches and seizures conducted by school officials in public schools.
Why did the student claim a search of her purse violated her rights?
The student tried to have the evidence from her purse suppressed because the search was a violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. She contended that the mere possession of cigarettes was not a violation of school rules; therefore, a desire for evidence of smoking in the restroom did not justify the search.
How has New Jersey V-TLO impacted society?
In New Jersey v. T.L.O. the Court recognized that students have a legitimate right to privacy and that searching their personal effects is a substantial invasion of privacy. The students' privacy rights must be balanced against the necessity of maintaining school discipline, the Court said.
Why did T.L.O. face juvenile delinquency charges?
Her mother brought T.L.O. to the police station, where she confessed to selling marijuana. Due to her age, T.L.O. faced delinquency charges in Juvenile Court. The Juvenile Court denied T.L.O.'s motion to suppress (keep out) her confession and the evidence from the search.
Why the Principal Can Search Your Purse | New Jersey v. T. L. O.
What happened in the New Jersey T.L.O. case?
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
What evidence did the school administrator find in T.L.O. possession?
The officials discovered cigarettes, a small amount of marijuana, and a list containing the names of students who owed T.L.O. money. T.L.O. was charged with possession of marijuana. Before trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search, but the Court denied her motion.
Is New Jersey v TLO still relevant today?
Although New Jersey v. T.L.O. was decided in 1985, it still has an impact on every student who brings a purse or backpack to school.
When was T.L.O. caught smoking?
* On March 7, 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, N.J., discovered two girls smoking in a lavatory. One of the two girls was the respondent T.L.O., who at that time was a 14-year-old high school freshman.
What was the bottom line for New Jersey v TLO?
T.L.O.: The Fourth Amendment in public schools. On January 15, 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New Jersey v. T.L.O., holding that public school administrators can search a student's belongings if they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
Was New Jersey vs. T.L.O. activism or restraint?
Answer and Explanation: New Jersey v. T.L.O. is an example of judicial restraint. The court further incorporated the 14th Amendment's due process clause and held that students did not waive all their rights by attending school, meaning that the meaning of the Fourth Amendment restrained their actions.
What is the most famous case of the 4th Amendment?
Brendlin v. California. This Fourth Amendment activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Brendlin v. California, dealing with search and seizure during a traffic stop.
Can schools check your purse?
If the school official has reasonable suspicion that you are violating school rules or the law, they can search your belongings without your consent.
Why did the court give schools officials more freedom than the police to conduct searches?
Final answer: The Court gives school officials more freedom than the police to conduct searches because of the unique nature of the school environment and the responsibilities of school officials. School officials act as surrogates for parents and have the duty to maintain discipline and ensure student safety.
What does TLO stand for in law?
A terrorism liaison officer (TLO) is an individual who has completed a fusion center recognized TLO Basic course in the state of California and can serve as a point of contact for a public safety agency in matters related to terrorism information and intelligence.
What is reasonable suspicion in New Jersey v TLO?
T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) Although the Fourth Amendment applies to searches in public schools, the more lenient standard of reasonable suspicion replaces the ordinary standard of probable cause.
What does the 4th amendment say?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ...
What cases are similar to New Jersey v TLO?
There are three cases that formed the backbone of Fourth Amendment law as applied to public schools: New Jersey v. T.L.O.,8 Vernonia School District v. Acton,9 and Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 Pottawatomie County v.
What was the court decision in New Jersey v TLO 1985?
The Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth ...
Who searched the belongings of T.L.O. after she had been caught smoking in the bathroom?
The juvenile court concluded that Choplick's search was reasonable. It said that Choplick was justified in searching the purse because of his reasonable suspicion that T.L.O. had violated school rules by smoking in the restroom.
What were the questions in the New Jersey v. TLO case?
In its decision in this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed three distinct questions: (1) what is the proper standard for judging the reasonableness of a school official's search of a student's purse; (2) on the facts of this case, did the school official violate that standard; and ( 3) whether the ...
What Supreme Court case allows students to make a symbolic protest in public schools?
In the landmark decision in Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court ruled that a symbolic protest, where public school students wore armbands, was protected under the First Amendment.
Which of these statements best describes the Court's ruling in New Jersey v. TLO?
The Court in New Jersey v. T.L.O. ruled that students have some protection against unreasonable searches, but school officials only need reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause. Therefore, the correct choice is B: Students are protected from unreasonable search and seizure.
What was T.L.O. doing when the teacher found her?
T.L.O. was a 14-year-old female student at a New Jersey high school. A teacher found T.L.O. and another student smoking cigarettes in the girls' restroom in the school building in violation of school rules.