What is an example of an undue influence case?
Asked by: Prof. Armand Nikolaus DVM | Last update: February 11, 2026Score: 4.4/5 (16 votes)
An example of an undue influence case involves a caregiver or family member isolating an elderly, vulnerable person and pressuring them to change their will or trust, leaving the influencer a larger inheritance, often by creating false fears about other family members, as seen in cases where a daughter isolated her father, convincing him to give her his home and assets instead of his other children. These cases often arise in wills, trusts, or financial power of attorney situations where one person uses a position of trust to override the true wishes of another, taking advantage of dependency or diminished capacity.
What is an example of undue influence case?
A husband and wife owned a family company and the company's liabilities to its bank were secured, among other things, by charges of the wife's house. The bank sought to enforce the securities and the wife pleaded actual undue influence by the husband.
What evidence is needed to prove undue influence?
The Most Important Evidence in an Undue Influence Claim. Under California financial elder abuse law, you must prove four elements to establish undue influence: (1) vulnerability of the victim, (2) apparent authority of the wrongdoer, (3) actions and tactics of the wrongdoer, and (4) an inequitable result.
Is undue influence easy to prove?
Undue influence can be difficult to prove because it usually happens out of sight so to speak and usually has to be proven by circumstantial or indirect evidence. Furthermore, not all influence is ``undue''.
What are the chances of winning an undue influence case?
In fact, very few undue influence claims win at trial because in most cases there is just not enough convincing evidence presented to the court. Remember, the court must receive admissible evidence to overturn a Trust or Will, merely opinion or speculation is not sufficient.
Undue Influence | Mussio Goodman Law
What are the three elements of undue influence?
Sarabia shows that all three elements—confidential relationship, active participation, and undue benefit—must be present for the legal presumption to kick in. But when they are, it can be decisive. California also enforces statutory presumptions of undue influence in certain high-risk situations.
What is the hardest case to win in court?
The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, like crimes against children or sexual assault, where jurors struggle with bias; complex, voluminous evidence, such as white-collar fraud; and defenses that challenge societal norms, like an insanity plea, which faces high scrutiny and conflicting expert testimony. Cases with weak physical evidence, uncooperative witnesses (like in sex crimes), or those involving unpopular defendants (e.g., child abusers) are particularly challenging for defense attorneys.
What not to say to a judge in court?
You should not say anything sarcastic, interrupt the judge, lie, use slang, make personal attacks on others, guarantee outcomes, or speak about things not relevant to the case; instead, remain respectful, address the judge as "Your Honor," answer only the question asked, and be direct and truthful to maintain credibility.
What are the three burdens of proof?
The three main burdens (or standards) of proof in law, from lowest to highest, are Preponderance of the Evidence, required for most civil cases (more likely than not); Clear and Convincing Evidence, used in certain civil matters needing higher certainty; and Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, the strict standard for criminal convictions, meaning near-certainty of guilt.
What two conditions must be present for a contract to be unconscionable?
A contract is most likely to be found unconscionable if both unfair bargaining and unfair substantive terms are shown. An absence of meaningful choice by the disadvantaged party is often used to prove unfair bargaining.
What are the red flags for undue influence?
Red flags that may point to undue influence
Isolation from family: The trustor stopped seeing close relatives or returning calls. In many cases, one person began managing their schedule, limited visitors or filtered all communication.
What are the biggest mistakes people make with their will?
“The biggest mistake people make with doing their will or estate plan is simply not doing anything and having no documents at all. For those people who have documents, the next biggest mistake people make is to let the documents get stale.
What two conditions must be met to show that counsel was ineffective?
A successful claim of ineffective assistance requires two things. First, your lawyer must have failed to follow professional standards while representing you. 1 Second, there must be a “reasonable probability” that your lawyer's poor representation negatively affected the outcome of your case.
How is undue influence proven in court?
Proving undue influence requires demonstrating: The vulnerability of the decedent (illness, cognitive decline, etc.) The influencer's authority or control over the decedent (e.g., caregiver, financial power) The actions or tactics used to override free will (isolation, threats, manipulation)
Can you go to jail for undue influence?
Criminal Penalties: In severe cases, undue influence may be classified as elder financial abuse or fraud, leading to criminal charges, fines, or imprisonment. Punitive Damages: Courts may impose additional damages to punish individuals who exploited a vulnerable party.
Who are the victims of undue influence?
Common victims of undue influence
Typically, manipulators will target elderly adults. Sometimes, the exploiter will look for adults in declining health who cannot leave their homes or those who suffer from a mental decline or Alzheimer's.
How much evidence is needed to prosecute?
“Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the highest standard of proof in the UK legal system and the threshold required for a criminal conviction. This means the prosecution must present evidence so compelling that no reasonable person would hesitate to find the defendant guilty.
What is clear and convincing evidence?
According to the Supreme Court in Colorado v. New Mexico, 467 U.S. 310 (1984), "clear and convincing” means that the evidence is highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue. In other words, the fact finder must be convinced that the contention is highly probable.
Can hearsay be considered as evidence?
California's "hearsay rule," defined under Evidence Code 1200, is a law that states that third-party hearsay cannot be used as evidence in a trial. This rule is based on the principle that hearsay is often unreliable and cannot be cross-examined.
What makes you look bad in court?
Dress Like You Are Going to Church
No low necklines, shorts, stiletto heels, tight jeans (actually, avoid jeans altogether), or sleeveless shirts. If you are wearing a button-up shirt, make sure it is fully buttoned and wear an undershirt or, if it is cool out, a sweater.
What is the B word for lawyer?
The "B word" for a lawyer, especially in the UK and Commonwealth countries, is Barrister, which refers to a specialist lawyer who argues cases in higher courts, distinct from a solicitor, though other terms like Attorney, Counsel, or even the pejorative "ambulance chaser" can be used, while "Esquire" (Esq.) is a title for any licensed lawyer in the U.S.
What shouldn't you tell your lawyer?
You should not tell a lawyer to downplay injuries, admit fault, lie, exaggerate, withhold details, or trash-talk others involved; avoid telling them how to do their job, comparing them to other lawyers, being overly casual (like saying "you guys"), or discussing irrelevant personal info, as honesty is key, but focus on facts and let the lawyer guide strategy, especially regarding admissions or social media posts.
What is the stupidest court case?
We all know the most famous frivolous lawsuit story. Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's back in 1992 when she spilled hot coffee on herself. "But coffee is meant to be hot" we all cry. Dig a little deeper into the case however and it starts to look less frivolous.
Which lawyer wins most cases?
There's no single lawyer universally recognized for the most cases won, as records are hard to track and definitions vary, but Gerry Spence is famous for never losing a criminal case and a long civil win streak (until 2010), while Guyanese lawyer Sir Lionel Luckhoo holds a Guinness World Record for 245 successive murder acquittals, making them top contenders for different aspects of "most wins".
What happens to 90% of court cases?
According to the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance, "The overwhelming majority (90 to 95 percent) of cases result in plea bargaining."