What is Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act?
Asked by: Ms. Eleonore Carroll Sr. | Last update: January 27, 2026Score: 4.7/5 (64 votes)
Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, declares relevant any facts that are the occasion, cause, or effect, immediate or otherwise, of facts in issue or other relevant facts, or that constitute the state of things under which they happened, or that afford an opportunity for their occurrence, states. Essentially, it brings in surrounding circumstances, preconditions, and consequences as admissible evidence to establish the main facts of a case.
What is Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act case law?
Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant.
What is Section 7 of the Indian Contract Act 1872?
Acceptance must be absolute. — In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must— (1)be absolute and unqualified; (2)be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner, unless the proposal prescribes the manner in which it is to be accepted.
What is the burden of proof under the Indian Evidence Act?
Whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on that person.
What is the best evidence rule in the Evidence Act?
The evidence law of India regards the “Best Evidence Rule” as a principle guiding the Indian Evidence Act 1872. By Best Evidence Rule we mean that the secondary evidence won't be applicable when primary evidence exists.
Section 7 Indian Evidence Act: Occasion, cause & effect
What is the strongest evidence in court?
Physical evidence is often one of the most powerful forms of evidence in a criminal case, especially when it links the defendant directly to the crime scene or victim. However, it's important to remember that physical evidence must be handled and preserved correctly to be admissible in court.
What are the 4 types of evidence?
The four main types of evidence, especially in legal and academic contexts, are Testimonial (spoken/written statements), Documentary (written records), Physical/Real (tangible items), and Demonstrative (visual aids like charts/diagrams). Other categorizations exist, like evidence for arguments (anecdotal, descriptive, correlational, causal) or textual evidence (quoting, paraphrasing).
Who must prove the burden of proof?
The burden of proof, sometimes known as the “onus”, is the requirement to satisfy that standard. In criminal cases, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, and the standard required of them is that they prove the case against the defendant “beyond reasonable doubt”.
What counts as strong evidence?
Scientific evidence varies in quality. High quality or strong evidence is that for which the change in scientists' belief in the truth of the claim is large, weak evidence is that for which the change is small.
What types of evidence are admissible?
Admissible evidence, in a court of law, is any testimonial, documentary, or tangible evidence that may be introduced to a factfinder—usually a judge or jury—to enable its invocation from the evidentiary record as needed to establish or to bolster a point put forth by a party to the proceeding.
What is a mistake under the Indian Contract Act?
The section states, “Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void.” Unilateral Mistake (Section 22): This arises when only one party is mistaken. Generally, a unilateral mistake does not render a contract void.
What is absolute and unqualified acceptance?
Acceptance Must Be Absolute and Unqualified
This means the offeree must accept the offer exactly as it is, without any modifications, conditions, or additions. Any attempt to alter the terms of the offer is considered a counter-offer, not acceptance, which effectively rejects the original offer.
What are the four types of consideration?
The various types of consideration are (1) a promise, (2) an act other than a promise, (3) forbearance, (4) a change in a legal relation of the parties, (5) money, or (6) other property.
What is the burden of proof under this Act?
California Code, Evidence Code - EVID § 115
“Burden of proof” means the obligation of a party to establish by evidence a requisite degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact or the court.
Which type of evidence is not admissible?
Hearsay: Second hand evidence obtained from a third party's experience, generally not admissible in criminal cases.
What is the distinction between burden of proof and onus of proof?
There is an essential distinction between burden of proof and onus of proof. Burden of proof lies upon a person who has to prove the fact and which never shifts. Onus of proof shifts. Such a shifting of onus is a continuous process in an evalution of evidence; Abdulla Mohammed Pagarkar v.
What are the signs of a weak case?
In that case, it's crucial to consult with a skilled criminal defense lawyer in California to evaluate your options and determine the best course of action.
- Lack of Evidence. ...
- Conflicting Evidence. ...
- Inadmissible Evidence. ...
- Excludable Evidence. ...
- Unreliable Witnesses. ...
- Lack of Motive or Opportunity. ...
- Errors in the Criminal Complaint.
What is the most powerful evidence?
The most powerful type of evidence, direct evidence, needs no inference. The evidence itself is the proof. This includes the testimony of a witness who saw an incident or the confession of the perpetrator. Written forms of proof, such as letters or wills, are considered documentary evidence.
What are the 7 types of evidence?
Types of Evidence
- Direct Evidence. Direct evidence is straightforward and, if believed, proves a fact without requiring any inference or presumption. ...
- Circumstantial Evidence. ...
- Physical Evidence. ...
- Testimonial Evidence. ...
- Documentary Evidence. ...
- Digital Evidence. ...
- Expert Witness Evidence.
What are the three burdens of proof?
The three main burdens (or standards) of proof in law, from lowest to highest, are Preponderance of the Evidence, required for most civil cases (more likely than not); Clear and Convincing Evidence, used in certain civil matters needing higher certainty; and Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, the strict standard for criminal convictions, meaning near-certainty of guilt.
Can hearsay be considered as evidence?
California's "hearsay rule," defined under Evidence Code 1200, is a law that states that third-party hearsay cannot be used as evidence in a trial. This rule is based on the principle that hearsay is often unreliable and cannot be cross-examined.
Who beats the burden of proof?
In most cases, the burden of proof rests solely on the prosecution, negating the need for a defense of this kind. However, when exceptions arise and the burden of proof has been shifted to the defendant, they are required to establish a defense that bears an "air of reality".
What evidence is not admissible in court?
Evidence not admissible in court often includes hearsay, illegally obtained evidence, irrelevant evidence, prior bad acts, and privileged communications, as well as overly prejudicial or speculative information, all of which violate legal rules, constitutional rights (like the 5th Amendment), or basic fairness to prevent misleading juries and protect rights.
What is the 7 of Evidence Act?
Facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant.
What is exculpatory evidence?
Exculpatory evidence is any evidence favorable to a defendant in a criminal case that tends to prove their innocence, justify their actions, or reduce their culpability, like an alibi or a witness statement contradicting the prosecution's claims, and prosecutors are constitutionally required to disclose it to the defense under the Brady Rule. It's the opposite of inculpatory evidence, which points toward guilt, and its suppression can lead to overturned convictions.