What is the 73 Evidence Act?
Asked by: Dr. Cassandre Klocko | Last update: April 9, 2026Score: 5/5 (4 votes)
"Section 73 of the Evidence Act" refers to different laws depending on the country, but most commonly relates to the court's power to compare disputed signatures, writings, or seals with admitted or proven samples to verify authenticity, as seen in India's Evidence Act, 1872, while New Zealand's Evidence Act 2006 (Section 73) deals with the compellability of defendants in criminal cases. Other jurisdictions, like Australia (Evidence Act 1995) or the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), have their own Section 73s, often concerning reputation evidence or foreign law.
What is the 73 of Evidence Act?
The Court may direct any person present in court to write any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the Court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person. This section applies also, with any necessary modifications, to finger-impressions.
What is the purpose of the Evidence Act?
The use of evidence in the criminal trial process
The Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) is the legislation that governs the use of evidence in legal proceedings in New South Wales. Once evidence is gathered, it is then used to determine whether a prosecution can proceed.
Which type of evidence is not admissible?
Hearsay evidence
Hearsay evidence is information provided outside of a court setting to someone involved in the trial. In most cases, judges don't allow hearsay evidence because the attorney for an opposing law team doesn't have an opportunity to cross-examine the person who provided the information.
What is section 73?
Sec 73-Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for any reason other than fraud or any wilful- misstatement or suppression of facts.
primary evidence | article 73 qso 1984 | section 62 evidence act 1872
What does section 73 mean?
Applications for removal or variation of a condition following grant of planning permission may also be referred to as a section 73 application. An application for Removal or Variation of conditions can be used to change or remove conditions which have been previously imposed.
What is the case law of Section 73?
—When an obligation resembling those created by contract has been incurred and has not been discharged, any person injured by the failure to discharge it is entitled to receive the same compensation from the party in default, as if such person had contracted to discharge it and had broken his contract.
Can screenshots of messages be used as evidence?
Yes, screenshots of messages can be used as evidence, but they are often considered weak or unreliable on their own because they can be easily edited, cropped, or taken out of context, making them difficult to authenticate; courts prefer original messages with complete metadata (dates, times, sender info) and often require extra proof, like testimony or forensic analysis, to confirm they are genuine.
What evidence cannot be used in court?
Evidence not admissible in court typically includes illegally obtained evidence (violating the Fourth Amendment), hearsay (out-of-court statements used for their truth), irrelevant or speculative information, privileged communications (like psychotherapist-patient), and confessions obtained through coercion, with rules varying slightly by jurisdiction but generally focusing on reliability, legality, and relevance.
What are the 4 types of evidence?
The four main types of evidence, especially in legal and academic contexts, are Testimonial (spoken/written statements), Documentary (written records), Physical/Real (tangible items), and Demonstrative (visual aids like charts/diagrams). Other categorizations exist, like evidence for arguments (anecdotal, descriptive, correlational, causal) or textual evidence (quoting, paraphrasing).
What makes evidence admissible in court?
Generally, to be admissible, the evidence must be relevant, and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or, among other reasons, based on hearsay).
What is the best evidence rule in the Evidence Act?
The evidence law of India regards the “Best Evidence Rule” as a principle guiding the Indian Evidence Act 1872. By Best Evidence Rule we mean that the secondary evidence won't be applicable when primary evidence exists.
What is the 69 Evidence Act?
"69. If no such attesting witness can be found, or if the document purports to have been executed in the United Kingdom, it must be proved that the attestation of one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting, and that the signature of the person executing the document is in the handwriting of that person."
What is Dhara 73?
IPC Section 73 - Solitary confinement.
What counts as strong evidence?
Scientific evidence varies in quality. High quality or strong evidence is that for which the change in scientists' belief in the truth of the claim is large, weak evidence is that for which the change is small.
What is hearsay evidence?
A written or oral statement made otherwise than by a witness giving their own first-hand evidence in proceedings, which is tendered as evidence of the matters stated and which is relied on in court to prove the truth of the matters stated.
What is the hardest case to win in court?
The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, complex evidence, or specific defenses like insanity, with sexual assault, crimes against children, and white-collar crimes frequently cited as challenging due to juror bias, weak physical evidence, or technical complexity. The insanity defense is notoriously difficult because it shifts the burden of proof and faces public skepticism.
What color do judges like to see in court?
Judges prefer neutral, conservative colors like navy, gray, black, brown, and white, as they convey seriousness, respect, and professionalism, while avoiding distractions. Bright colors, flashy patterns, and overly casual attire (like shorts or t-shirts) are discouraged because they can appear unserious or disrespectful in a formal courtroom setting.
What makes evidence illegal?
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
How far back can courts get text messages?
Subpoenas can seek messages as far back as they exist, but the availability depends on two things: carrier retention policies and legal relevance. Carriers often only store message content for a few days to months, though metadata may be kept longer.
What kind of evidence cannot be used in court?
Evidence not admissible in court typically includes illegally obtained evidence (violating the Fourth Amendment), hearsay (out-of-court statements used for their truth), irrelevant or speculative information, privileged communications (like psychotherapist-patient), and confessions obtained through coercion, with rules varying slightly by jurisdiction but generally focusing on reliability, legality, and relevance.
Can deleted WhatsApp messages be used in court?
If the Messages Are Unaltered and Retrievable
WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption makes it difficult to modify messages. However, courts will only accept messages that can be directly retrieved from a device, cloud backup, or forensic extraction tools like Cellebrite.
What is the penalty for Section 73?
Section 73 of CGST Act allows taxpayers to avoid GST penalties if tax shortfall is paid voluntarily or within 30 days of notice. It applies to cases with no fraud. Pay through DRC-03, save penalty, and stay compliant.
How to prove damages in court?
To sum up, to prove damages in a personal injury case, we have to prove with a reasonable degree of certainty that the defendant(s)' actions caused our client's injuries. Circumstantial evidence is sometimes enough to demonstrate this causation, but the evidence has to be persuasive to a jury.
What damages are covered under section 73?
Section 73 of the ICA provides as follows: When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has committed breach, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach, or which the ...