What was the court decision in New York Times Company v United States 1971 )?
Asked by: Thurman Bartoletti | Last update: June 1, 2025Score: 4.3/5 (34 votes)
In a 6-3 decision, the Court dissolved the restraining order and allowed the Times to continue with publication.
What was the Court's decision in New York Times v. United States?
The Court ruled 6-3 in New York Times v. United States that the prior restraint was unconstitutional.
What was the result of the Pentagon Papers case in 1971?
On June 30, 1971, in what is regarded as one of the most significant prior-restraint cases in history, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 6–3 decision freed the newspapers to resume publishing the material. The court held that the government had failed to justify restraint of publication.
What was the decision in New York v United States?
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, found that the federal government may not require states to “take title” to radioactive waste through the "Take Title" provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act, which the Court found to exceed Congress's power under the Commerce Clause.
Which best describes the ruling in New York Times v. United States?
Therefore, the correct answer to the student's question is: "The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security." The ruling highlighted the principle that while national security is important, the First Amendment protection of the press is paramount in a democratic society.
New York Times v. United States, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]
What was the Supreme Court ruling in New York Times?
Decision: The United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the newspaper. The Court said the right to publish all statements is protected under the First Amendment.
What happened in New York Times v. United States quizlet?
This case is significant as the ruling made it possible for The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers to publish the then-classified Pentagon Papers without risk of government censorship or punishment. This made it possible for newspapers to publish information that did not directly harm the US troops.
What was the big idea of the New York Times v United States case?
The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.
Why did the Court find the prior restraint unconstitutional?
The state law criminalized press publication of a juvenile offender's name without a juvenile court order. The Court unanimously held the law to be an unconstitutional prior restraint. It explained that the press can't be penalized for publishing truthful information that it lawfully obtained.
What does the guarantee clause say?
Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
What exactly did the Pentagon Papers reveal?
Johnson's administration had "systematically lied, not only to the public but also to Congress." The Pentagon Papers revealed that the U.S. had secretly enlarged the scope of its actions in the Vietnam War with coastal raids on North Vietnam and Marine Corps attacks—none of which were reported in the mainstream media.
Which best describes why the government tried to prevent the New York Times from publishing articles on the Vietnam War?
The articles threatened national security.
What does credibility gap mean in U.S. history?
After the Vietnam War, the term "credibility gap" came to be used by political opponents in cases where an actual, perceived or implied discrepancy existed between a politician's public pronouncements and the actual, perceived or implied reality.
Who broke the Pentagon Papers?
Two days prior to the Supreme Court's decision, Ellsberg publicly admitted his role in releasing the Pentagon Papers to the press, and surrendered to federal authorities at the U.S. Attorney's office in Boston.
What was the main holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in the New York Times v Tasini case?
In Tasini, the Court ruled that freelance journalists retained copyrights for their individual articles and that in the absence of written agreements, publishers could not license the simple text of such articles to computer databases (or for use on searchable CD-ROMs) without infringing the author's rights, if the ...
How can 1st Amendment speech be limited?
Speech on government land or in government buildings usually may be limited, if the government does not discriminate on the basis of the viewpoint of the speech. Additionally, speech by prisoners and by members of the military may be broadly restricted.
What was the decision in New York Times v. US?
In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that the President's attempt to prevent the publication was a violation of First Amendment protections for press freedom. Daniel Ellsberg was a part of a top secret study conducted by the Department of Defense about the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
Is prior restraint still used today?
Prior restraint, press freedom and your right to know
Courts have ensured it does not happen in the United States, except in very extreme cases. Instead, we rely on specific punishments that consider what was said and any actual harm from speech. These guidelines let most protected speech continue to flourish.
Why did the Supreme Court find the prior restraint unconstitutional Pentagon Papers?
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) that despite the sensitive nature of the information, the newspapers could still publish it under the no prior restraint doctrine. Free expression outweighed the potential harm that could have resulted from publishing the story.
What happened in the New York v United States case?
The decision in this case affirmed New York's state sovereignty, which means that states have supreme authority over their territory to regulate their political affairs without interference.
What is the best describes the ruling in New York Times v. United States?
United States, which best describes what the government had to prove for itscensorship of the New York Times to have been acceptable? The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.
Why does New York Times Co v United States matter?
Why does New York Times Co. v. United States matter? In this ruling, the Court established a “heavy presumption against prior restraint,” even in cases involving national security.
What two considerations were being balanced in New York Times v. United States 1971 concerning the Pentagon Papers?
United States (1971), the two considerations being balanced were freedom of the press and national security. The New York Times had obtained classified documents known as the Pentagon Papers, which revealed damaging information about the U.S. government's involvement in the Vietnam War.
What does prior restraint mean in government?
In First Amendment law, prior restraint is government action that prohibits speech or other expression before the speech happens. Prior restraint typically happens in a few ways. It may be a statute or regulation that requires a speaker to acquire a permit or license before speaking.
What principle did the Supreme Court decision in Schenck v United States establish?
The Court ruled that freedom of speech and freedom of the press under the First Amendment could be limited only if the words in the circumstances created "a clear and present danger." Bluebook Citation: Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).