Which of the following best describes Baker V. Carr?
Asked by: Prof. Gabe Murazik IV | Last update: July 14, 2026Score: 5/5 (9 votes)
The correct reasoning in Baker v. Carr (1961) is that unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts. This case established the principle of "one person, one vote," ensuring equal representation for all citizens.
What best describes Baker v. Carr?
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
What was the Baker v. Carr case about?
Facts of the case
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.
Which of the following accurately summarizes the decision in Baker v. Carr?
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)? Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law.
The Supreme Court Case That Caused a Justice to Have a Nervous Breakdown | Baker v. Carr
What is the significant ruling of the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court case?
The Baker decision protected individual rights by holding that unequal representation of citizens is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by courts. In 1964, the Supreme Court heard six more cases regarding legislative apportionment in Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, New York, and Virginia.
What is the term of Baker v. Carr?
A U.S. Supreme Court case holding that federal courts can decide whether state voting districts were properly created or were, instead, improperly drawn based on political or racial considerations. In legal terms, the Court found that these cases were "justiciable," meaning they could properly be decided by a court.
Which of the following is true of the Supreme Court ruling in 1883 regarding Civil Rights Cases?
What did the Civil Rights Cases of 1883 accomplish? The Supreme Court ruled in the 1883 Civil Rights Cases that the government could not prevent private businesses from refusing to service African American customers. This was a major setback in the quest for civil rights for African American people.
Which act established the first Supreme Court Quizlet?
the Judiciary Act of 1789; It created the Supreme Court with its Chief Justice and five associate justices; three circuit courts, each consisting of two Supreme Court justices and one district court judge; and 13 federal district courts.
How did Schechter v. US 1935 affect the New Deal?
Schechter Poultry's sweeping interpretations of legislative power had devastating effects on President Roosevelt's New Deal programs in the 1930s. The centerpiece of the New Deal legislation, the NIRA, was essentially declared unconstitutional.
Why does Baker v. Carr matter?
The decision opened the door to lawsuits over legislative apportionment in other states, many of which alleged that state legislatures had failed to reapportion districts to reflect growing urban populations, thereby giving undue political influence to voters in rural areas.
What is the most important Supreme Court case of all time?
Landmark United States Supreme Court Cases
- Marbury v. Madison (1803) ...
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ...
- Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) ...
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ...
- Schenck v. United States (1919) ...
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ...
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) ...
- Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Who won, Baker or Carr?
On March 26, 1962, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-2 in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that apportionment cases are justiciable (i.e., that federal courts have the right to intervene in such cases).
Who was Charles Baker in Baker v. Carr?
C.W. "Charles" Baker, seen here in May 1965, was one of 11 plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit seeking to force Tennessee to redraw its legislative districts. A redistricting committee of Tennessee lawmakers working on reapportionment during a special session in May of 1965.
What case is similar to Baker v. Carr?
In 1962, Colegrove was overturned by the blockbuster 6:2 decision in Baker v. Carr, which applied the principle of “one person, one vote” to state legislative districts in Tennessee. The following year, the same rationale was applied to congressional districts in Wesberry v. Sanders.
What Supreme Court case is one person, one vote?
14-940 EVENWEL V. ABBOTT
In Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), this Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes a "one-person, one-vote" principle.
What established the first Supreme Court?
Established by the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court began to take shape with the passage of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and has enjoyed a rich history since its first assembly in 1790.
Can a president fire a judge?
Only Congress has the authority to remove an Article III judge. This is done through a vote of impeachment by the House and a trial and conviction by the Senate.
What was the first act of the United States Congress?
On this date, the Oath of Office bill, the first legislative act of Congress, was signed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. President George Washington signed the bill into law on June 1, 1789.
What was the Supreme Court decision on the Civil Rights Cases of 1883?
The Supreme Court's decision in the Civil Rights Cases eliminated the only federal law that prohibited racial discrimination by individuals or private businesses and left African Americans who were victims of private discrimination to seek legal recourse in unsympathetic state courts.
What was the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the constitutional rights of individuals during custodial interrogation?
The Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world.
Which U.S. Supreme Court era is known for being a benchmark in civil liberties and civil rights?
The Warren Court may have left a greater impact on the nation than any other era of the Supreme Court. It dramatically expanded civil rights and other constitutional protections. Critics at the time and afterward have attacked the Warren Court for activist decisions that tested the boundaries of judicial power.
What best describes Baker v. Carr?
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
What was the Baker v. Carr case about?
Facts of the case
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.