Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr?
Asked by: Nathaniel Breitenberg | Last update: March 16, 2026Score: 5/5 (65 votes)
The outcome of Baker v. Carr was that the redistricting of state legislative districts is a justiciable question, meaning federal courts can hear cases alleging that a state's apportionment plan violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What was the outcome of the Baker v. Carr case?
The Supreme Court reversed, finding that the subject matter of the case was within the federal judicial power, the plaintiffs had the legal standing necessary to bring their claims, and most importantly, that legislative apportionment was in fact a justiciable issue and not a political question.
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr (1962)?
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr (1962)? The redistricting of state legislative districts is justiciable by the Federal Courts.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
The Fourteenth Amendment addresses a variety of issues concerning citizenship and citizens' rights "Equal protection of the laws". As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.
Which statement most accurately describes the core ruling and impact of Baker v. Carr (1962)?
The U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Baker v. Carr (1962) was that Congressional redistricting is subject to judicial review. In this case, the Court established that federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving allegations of a state's violation of the equal protection clause in redistricting.
Supreme Court Landmark Case [Baker v. Carr]
What was the effect of the Warren Court's decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)?
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
What was the outcome of Marbury v. Madison Quizlet?
The Marbury v. Madison (1803) decision established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress (like parts of the Judiciary Act of 1789) unconstitutional, making the Judicial Branch a co-equal branch of government with the Executive and Legislative branches, and affirming the Constitution as the supreme law. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the opinion, ruling against William Marbury (who sought his commission as a justice of the peace) but doing so in a way that significantly expanded the Court's power by invalidating a law.
What was the significant ruling of the Baker Supreme Court case?
Cases about apportionment could now be heard by the Supreme Court. The ruling in Baker v. Carr (1962) was pivotal because it established that cases involving legislative apportionment could be heard by federal courts.
What 1969 event became the most dramatic action taken by militant American Indians in the United States?
The occupation of Alcatraz Island is one of the most significant Red Power Movement actions, acting as a catalyst for the movement as a whole. On November 20, 1969, a group of American Indian activists under the name “Indians of All Tribes” occupied Alcatraz, an island in the San Francisco bay.
Which of the following is true of the current status of redistricting in Texas Quizlet?
Which of the following is true of the current status of redistricting in Texas? Texas doesn't have to get preclearance from the Justice Department for its redistricting maps.
Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court's first ruling on the nationalization of the Bill of Rights in 1833 Quizlet?
Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court's first ruling on the nationalization of the Bill of Rights in the 1833? The Bill of Rights limits the national government but not state governments.
What was the most significant result of the ruling in Marbury versus Madison brainly?
The most significant result of Marbury v. Madison (1803) was the establishment of judicial review, granting the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of the legislative or executive branches unconstitutional, solidifying the judiciary as a co-equal branch of government and a fundamental check on the other two. While Chief Justice John Marshall ruled he couldn't force James Madison to deliver William Marbury's commission, he used the opportunity to declare a part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional, setting this crucial precedent.
Which of the following is a major result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission?
The ruling barred restrictions on corporations, unions, and nonprofit organizations from independent expenditures, allowing groups to independently support political candidates with financial resources.
What impact does Baker V Carr have today?
Baker v. Carr opened the door to judicial review of the redistricting process, prompted a cascade of subsequent lawsuits, and sent shockwaves through the redistricting community.
What did the Baker decision say you could successfully do?
The Baker decision established that redistricting issues could be subject to judicial review, allowing courts to intervene in cases of extreme partisan gerrymandering.
Which event was the most immediate result of the American government's response to the Plains Indians' resistance to western expansion of the United States?
The Battle of the Little Bighorn, known to the Lakota and other Plains Indians as the Battle of the Greasy Grass, and commonly referred to as Custer's Last Stand, was an armed engagement between combined forces of the Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes and the 7th Cavalry Regiment of the United States ...
What dramatic events disrupted American society in 1968?
Other events that made history that year include the Vietnam War's Tet Offensive, riots in Washington, DC, the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1968, and heightened social unrest over the Vietnam War, values, and race. The National Archives holds records documenting the turbulent time during 1968.
What role did Presidents Kennedy and Johnson play in the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
On July 2, 1964, a little more than a year after President Kennedy introduced the bill, President Johnson officially signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law. The act made discrimination in public facilities and federally funded programs illegal.
What was the outcome of the Baker v. Carr case?
The Supreme Court reversed, finding that the subject matter of the case was within the federal judicial power, the plaintiffs had the legal standing necessary to bring their claims, and most importantly, that legislative apportionment was in fact a justiciable issue and not a political question.
What was the outcome of the Baker case?
The Supreme Court said that decision-makers must be "reasonable". They also found that Ministerial decisions in this case should follow values that are in international human rights law. The disposition in the case was that the matter was returned to the Minister for redetermination by a different immigration officer.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
The Fourteenth Amendment addresses a variety of issues concerning citizenship and citizens' rights "Equal protection of the laws". As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.
What is an example of a counter majoritarian?
Examples of countermajoritarian structures that provide targeted protections include legislative bodies with territorial representation; advisory councils with veto power over elected officials' decisions; appointed legislative members or bodies; and federalism.
What was the Judiciary Act of 1789?
The Act provided a charter for the federal judicial system by specifying the jurisdiction and powers of the district and circuit courts, and the qualifications and authority of federal judges, district attorneys, court clerks, U.S. Marshals, and Deputy Marshals.
What is an example of a judicial review?
Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment states Congress' power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. Yet another important example of judicial review is the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended the ability to discriminate based on religion, national origin, and gender.
What were the effects of the Warren Court decisions on the rights of the accused?
The Court's ruling guaranteed the right to legal counsel for all criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Accused of breaking into a poolroom in Panama City, Florida, in 1961, Clarence Earl Gideon tried to get a court-appointed lawyer, and failed.