Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the decision in Baker v. Carr?
Asked by: Miss Fay Wuckert | Last update: January 27, 2026Score: 4.1/5 (12 votes)
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law.
What is the decision in Baker v. Carr?
The Supreme Court reversed, finding that the subject matter of the case was within the federal judicial power, the plaintiffs had the legal standing necessary to bring their claims, and most importantly, that legislative apportionment was in fact a justiciable issue and not a political question.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr quizlet?
The Fourteenth Amendment addresses a variety of issues concerning citizenship and citizens' rights "Equal protection of the laws". As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), courts can require states to redraw voting districts so that they are roughly equal in population.
What was the result of Baker versus Carr?
Summary. In the 6-2 majority opinion, the Supreme Court held that questions of legislative apportionment were justiciable. In his majority opinion, Justice William Brennan cited previous examples where the Court corrected state administration of laws that violated the rights of its citizens.
What best describes Baker v. Carr?
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
BAKER V CARR
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr?
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law.
What did the Baker decision say you could successfully do?
The Baker decision established that redistricting issues could be subject to judicial review, allowing courts to intervene in cases of extreme partisan gerrymandering.
What impact does Baker V Carr have today?
Baker v. Carr opened the door to judicial review of the redistricting process, prompted a cascade of subsequent lawsuits, and sent shockwaves through the redistricting community.
Why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of Baker?
The reason and motive for the baker's refusal were based on his sincere religious beliefs and convictions. The Court's precedents make clear that the baker, in his capacity as the owner of a business serving the public, might have his right to the free exercise of religion limited by generally applicable laws.
How did the Supreme Court's decision in Baker v. Carr affect voter representation?
The Court held that “the question of whether people underrepresented in their government were being deprived of the equal protection of the laws was a justiciable one, subject to the jurisdiction of the courts.” Through the door that Baker opened, the Court soon developed the “one man, one vote” rule (a phrase that ...
Which of the following best describes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)?
ESEA is an extensive statute that funds primary and secondary education, emphasizing high standards and accountability. As mandated in the act, funds are authorized for professional development, instructional materials, resources to support educational programs, and the promotion of parental involvement.
Which of the following is true of the current status of redistricting in Texas Quizlet?
Which of the following is true of the current status of redistricting in Texas? Texas doesn't have to get preclearance from the Justice Department for its redistricting maps.
Why did the Supreme Court rule against Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters. Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker?
The ruling in Baker v. Carr established judicial authority over redistricting and emphasized the need for equitable district populations, which became crucial in subsequent court decisions and the enforcement of fair voting practices.
Who won, Baker or Carr?
The opinion was finally handed down in March 1962, nearly a year after it was initially argued. The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker's case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions.
Did the Baker win the case?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple because of his sincerely held religious beliefs, but the high court left critical questions about free speech unanswered.
What were the key arguments in Baker v. Carr?
Facts of the case
Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr?
Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr (1962)? The redistricting of state legislative districts is justiciable by the Federal Courts.
What as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr courts can require states to?
Sims, when the Court articulated the principle of "one person, one vote" that would require many states to redraw the lines of their electoral districts and amend their constitutions. This applies to all states with bicameral legislatures.
How important can a baker be for a village?
A baker is important for a village for several reasons: Food Supply: Bakers provide essential food items like bread, cakes, and pastries which are a staple in many diets. Community Gathering: The bakery can become a social spot where villagers meet and interact.
What is the intent of the Baker Act?
What is the Baker Act? The Florida Mental Health Act, commonly referred to as the Baker Act, focuses on crisis services for individuals with mental illness, much like an emergency department is for individuals experiencing a medical emergency.
Which of the following Supreme Court cases involved the principle of one person one vote?
In Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), this Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes a "one-person, one-vote" principle.
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the concept of judicial review as established by Marbury v. Madison?
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the concept of judicial review, as established by Marbury v. Madison? The Supreme Court should review laws that conflict with the Constitution and can strike down a law as unconstitutional.
Which of the following is true of the Supreme Court ruling in 1883 regarding civil rights cases?
What did the Supreme Court decide in the Civil Rights Cases (1883)? In 1883, The United States Supreme Court ruled that the Civil Rights act of 1875 did not apply to private citizens or entities. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 forbade discrimination in public places such as trains, theatres, and hotels.
What difference in the facts of Baker v Carr and Wesberry v Sanders that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision?
Baker v. Carr (1962) dealt with unequal representation in state legislatures due to outdated district boundaries, while Wesberry v. Sanders (1963) focused on unequal congressional representation within a state. Both cases emphasized equal representation and voting rights, with Baker v.