Who did Dred Scott sue?

Asked by: Dr. Kenna Adams III  |  Last update: January 15, 2026
Score: 4.7/5 (74 votes)

In 1846, after laboring and saving for years, the Scotts sought to buy their freedom from Sanford, but she refused. Dred Scott then sued Sanford in a state court, arguing that he was legally free because he and his family had lived in a territory where slavery was banned.

What did Dred Scott try to sue?

In 1846, an enslaved Black man named Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court. They claimed that they were free due to their residence in a free territory where slavery was prohibited.

Did Abraham Lincoln like Dred Scott?

''' To Lincoln, the ruling in the Dred Scott case served to further strip enslaved people of their humanity and validate the evil of slavery. Although Lincoln vehemently protested this ruling, he also expressed his strong belief in the principles of the United States legal system.

Who was mad at the Dred Scott decision?

Born in racism, the Dred Scott decision inflamed tensions leading to civil war. Northerners who hated slavery were furious. Southern enslavers were elated.

Who was Dred Scott enslaved to?

Dred Scott was a slave who was owned by John Emerson of Missouri. In 1833 Emerson undertook a series of moves as part of his service in the U.S. military. He took Scott from Missouri (a slave state) to Illinois (a free state) and finally into the Wisconsin Territory (a free territory).

Dred Scott: Suing for Freedom

30 related questions found

What did Harriet Scott do?

Harriet Robinson Scott ( c. 1820 – June 17, 1876) was an African American woman who fought for her freedom alongside her husband, Dred Scott, for eleven years. Their legal battle culminated in the infamous United States Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857.

Where was Scott taken by his slaveholder to live?

By 1830, Scott was living in St. Louis, still a slave to Blow. He was sold to Army doctor John Emerson in 1831 and accompanied him to his various postings — including stations in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory (what is now Minnesota).

Why were Republicans angered by the Dred Scott decision?

The Dred Scott decision infuriated Republicans by rendering their goal—to prevent slavery's spread into the territories—unconstitutional. To Republicans, the decision offered further proof of the reach of the South's Slave Power, which now apparently extended even to the Supreme Court.

Who was impacted by the Dred Scott decision?

The decision horrified many people in the North. Abolitionists there continued their agitation against slavery. By convincing many Northerners that the South was determined to preserve and extend slavery, the Dred Scott decision served to widen the gap between Northern and Southern states.

What president suspended habeas corpus?

In 1862, President Lincoln issued Presidential Proclamation 94 which suspended the writ of habeas corpus. (The writ of habeas corpus is a tool preventing the government from unlawfully imprisoning individuals outside of the judicial process).

Who opposed Dred Scott?

Answer and Explanation: The plaintiff, or opposition, in the Dred Scott court case was John Sandford. Sandford was the brother-in-law of Scott's original owner, John Emerson.

What did Stephen Douglas think of slavery?

Douglas argued that the question was moot because the Constitution of the United States allowed slavery to exist. He believed that only a state, through the voice of its inhabitants and their elected legislatures, had the right to decide to allow slavery within its borders.

Did Dred Scott win?

Dred Scott did, in fact, get his freedom, but not through the courts. After he and his wife were later bought by the Blow family (who had sold Scott to Emerson in the first place), they were freed in 1857. Scott died of tuberculosis in St. Louis the following year.

Why did Dred Scott's ruling anger northerners?

Answer and Explanation: The Dred Scott decision angered many northerners because many of them thought owning slaves was morally wrong. They also feared the spread of slavery would threaten job opportunities for northern farmers and laborers all over the country, especially in the expanding west.

What was Taney's opinion on Dred Scott?

In his majority opinion, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney cited two main rationales for ruling against Scott; first, as an African American, Scott "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect," and was therefore not eligible bring a suit to court.

What argument did Scott use to sue for his freedom?

In 1846, after laboring and saving for years, the Scotts sought to buy their freedom from Sanford, but she refused. Dred Scott then sued Sanford in a state court, arguing that he was legally free because he and his family had lived in a territory where slavery was banned.

Which president supported the Dred Scott decision?

Two days after James Buchanan was inaugurated the 15th president of the United States, the Supreme Court issued the Dred Scott decision, opening all American territories to slavery until the time came to seek admission as a state.

What was Dred Scott's legacy?

Dred Scott was born as a slave in Virginia and died a free man in Missouri in 1858. Scott's legacy Supreme Court case served as a major push towards the Civil War, challenging the states on slavery, citizenship, and state sovereignty.

How did the South react to Dred Scott?

Final answer: The South positively received the Dred Scott decision, as it expanded slavery into new territories. However, this ruling widened the sectional divide, leading towards the Civil War.

Why was the Missouri Compromise declared unconstitutional?

Chief Justice Roger Taney and six other Justices ruled that Missouri Compromise was illegal because Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, and slave masters were guaranteed property rights under the Fifth Amendment.

Why did the North not like the Dred Scott decision?

Northerners, especially Republicans, were outraged by the decision. They sided with the two lone dissenters, believing that Scott was a free man due to his time in free territory, as Congress was allowed to prohibit slavery in the territories.

What happened to Dred Scott's daughter?

Harriet Scott was buried in Greenwood Cemetery in Hillsdale, Missouri. She outlived her husband by 18 years, dying on June 17, 1876. Their daughter, Eliza, married and had two sons. Their other daughter, Lizzie, never married but, following Eliza's early death, helped raise Eliza's sons (Lizzie's nephews).

How old was Dred Scott when he went to court?

Dred Scott was about 50 years old when the case began. He was born into enslavement in Virginia around 1799, as property of the Peter Blow family.

What made Frederick run away from the plantation?

Sent back to the Eastern Shore, Frederick Douglass yearned for the freedom he saw white men had. He did not want to work in the fields for the rest of his life. As a teenager, Douglass attempted his first escape by canoe from a plantation that had hired Douglass from his owner.