Who won Baker v Carr case?

Asked by: Nettie Jenkins  |  Last update: October 12, 2023
Score: 4.9/5 (71 votes)

The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker's case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions.

Who won the decision in Baker v Carr?

A group of urban voters including Memphis resident Charles Baker sued Tennessee Secretary of State Joseph Carr for more equal representation. In a 6-2 decision, Justice William Brennan wrote for the majority that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause was valid grounds to bring a reapportionment lawsuit.

What happened in the case of Baker v Carr?

Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas.

What was the ruling in Baker v Carr AP Gov?

Baker v. Carr is one of the required Supreme Court cases for AP U.S. Government and Politics. This case resulted in the decision that facilitated the development of the “one person, one vote” doctrine and enabled federal courts to weigh in on legislative redistricting questions.

What was the outcome of Baker v Carr 1962 quizlet?

Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws.

Baker v. Carr, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]

24 related questions found

What was the Court decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?

The Supreme Court decided for Baker. They ruled that federal courts have the authority to enforce the 14th amendment if the state legislative districts are disproportionately populated. The District Court should not have dismissed Biggers issue just because they felt they didn't have jurisdiction.

What was the overall question in Baker v Carr?

The case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which then had to resolve the question: Does the federal judiciary have jurisdiction over questions of state legislative appointments?

What is the significance of Baker v. Carr 1962 quizlet?

What is the significance of Baker v Carr.? The Court held that that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases.

What concept did the Baker v. Carr decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1962 help to establish?

The 6-2 decision in favor of Baker, written by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., was significant because it established legislative apportionment as justiciable (meaning a federal court could intervene) under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr 1962?

Question: Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? Answer: Congressional redistricting is subject to judicial review.

Was Baker v Carr overturned?

The Supreme Court destroyed Baker v. Carr with redistricting decision.

Which justice died because of Baker v Carr?

The ninth justice, Charles Evans Whittaker, found trying the case so upsetting he had a nervous breakdown and skipped the final vote. He resigned right after the decision and soon after died. Yet Chief Justice Earl Warren called Baker v. Carr the most important decision rendered in his 16 years on the High Court.

Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v Carr 1962?

Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Baker v. Carr (1962)? The redistricting of state legislative districts is justiciable by the Federal Courts.

Why is Baker v Carr an example of judicial activism?

Baker v. Carr is important in American constitutional development because it expands the jurisdiction of federal courts under Article III of the US Constitution by ruling that legislative apportionment is, in fact, a valid legal question that can be remedied by federal courts.

What is the 14th Amendment?

Passed by the Senate on June 8, 1866, and ratified two years later, on July 9, 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to all persons "born or naturalized in the United States," including formerly enslaved people, and provided all citizens with “equal protection under the laws,” extending the provisions of ...

How did the Supreme Court decision Baker v Carr 1962 bring about a landmark change in the way seats are apportioned in the House of Representatives?

The Supreme Court decision in this case required nearly every state in the Union to redistrict on the principle of "one person, one vote," thus increasing the influence of urban areas and decreasing that of rural areas in the House.

How was the US changed because of Baker v. Carr?

Impact on Redistricting

Baker v. Carr opened the door to judicial review of the redistricting process, prompted a cascade of subsequent lawsuits, and sent shockwaves through the redistricting community.

What did the Supreme Court decisions in Baker v. Carr in 1962 and Reynolds v Sims in 1964 rule?

Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.

What accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr 1962?

Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law.

What was the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v Sims?

In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court's precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees.” In…

Which of the following statements best summarizes how Baker v. Carr 1962 impacted the movement towards redistricting reform?

Carr (1962) impacted the movement towards redistricting reform? The Court argued that the issue of redistricting did not come under the jurisdiction of the federal government. The Court ordered Congress to create a non-partisan federal bureau to oversee redistricting.

What was the majority opinion quote Baker v. Carr?

Majority Opinion (Brennan)

delivered the majority opinion of the court. He wrote “We conclude that the complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection present a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which appellants are entitled to a trial and a decision.

Which of the following statements best describes the outcome of Baker v. Carr?

Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1961) ? Unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts.

What practice did the Baker decision address quizlet?

In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court ruled that a voter could challenge the creation of congressional districts on the grounds that it violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In response, suits for reapportionment were brought in at least thirty-four states.