Who won Tinker vs Des Moines?

Asked by: Moises Feeney  |  Last update: July 24, 2022
Score: 4.1/5 (1 votes)

Decision: In 1969 the United States Supreme Court

United States Supreme Court
Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari.
https://www.uscourts.gov › activity-resources › supreme-1
ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students' free rights should be protected and said, "Students don't shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates."

What was the court's decision in Tinker v Des Moines?

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court's majority ruled that neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning ...

What was the outcome of Tinker v Des Moines quizlet?

The Supreme court held that the armbands did represent symbolic speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it.

What was Des Moines argument?

In order to keep a school funcitioning there has to be rules prohibiting that would be disruptive to the school environment. School discipline is an important part of childrens development as good citizens. The school was only trying keep their learning environments without distractions.

Why does Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent setting case?

Why does Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent-setting case? It protected all symbolic speech in war protests.

Tinker v. Des Moines, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]

42 related questions found

Who was president during Tinker vs Des Moines?

Black was President Franklin D. Roosevelt's first appointment to the Court. Justice Black penned one of two dissenting opinions in Tinker v. Des Moines stating “It is a myth to say that any person has a constitutional right to say what he pleases, where he pleases, and when he pleases.

Why did Tinker vs Des Moines go to the Supreme Court?

7–2 decision for Tinker

The Supreme Court held that the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it. The Court also held that the students did not lose their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech when they stepped onto school property.

Why did the Supreme Court find in favor of the students in the Tinker case?

In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students' free rights should be protected and said, "Students don't shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates."

What was the aftermath of Tinker v. Des Moines?

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District remains a frequently cited Supreme Court precedent. Thanks to the ruling, over the years the ACLU has successfully defended the right of students to wear an anti-abortion armband, a pro-LGBT T-shirt, and shirts critical of political figures.

What was the outcome of the 1969 case Tinker v. Des Moines Why do experts say this is one of the most important school related First Amendment rulings?

Decision. Yes. The Supreme Court ruled that the armbands were a form of symbolic speech, which is protected by the First Amendment, and therefore the school had violated the students' First Amendment rights.

Did BL join varsity cheerleading squad?

The controversy began when then-freshman Brandi Levy – identified in court papers by her initials “B.L” – learned that she did not make the varsity cheerleading squad and also did not get her desired position on a softball team unaffiliated with Mahanoy Area High School.

Why was Justice Black so concerned about the Court's decision in the Tinker case?

1. Why was Justice Black so concerned about the Court's decision in the Tinker case? Justice Black is concerned about the time, place, and manner of the speech.

How did the Court distinguish between the Tinker case and the Fraser case?

Fraser protested his punishment, stating that it violated the precedent established by Tinker. The Court distinguished between “political” speech that is protected under Tinker and “vulgar” speech during a school-sponsored event.

Which best describes how Tinker v Des Moines extended protected speech under the First Amendment?

Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment? The decision affirmed the protection of unpopular opinions.

How long were the Tinkers suspended?

The usual punishment for such an offense was a one-day, in-school suspension. Ewing was suspended for five days. Another time is seen when Madison Oster, who walked out of her Illinois school in support of gun rights in March, sued her school district for censoring her free speech.

Who won the New York Times v United States?

The Court ruled 6-3 in New York Times v. United States that the prior restraint was unconstitutional. Though the majority justices disagreed on some important issues, they agreed that “Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government…

Who won Bethel vs Fraser?

403 v. Fraser, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on July 7, 1986, ruled (7–2) that school officials did not violate a student's free speech and due process rights when he was disciplined for making a lewd and vulgar speech at a school assembly.

What is the difference between the Tinker standard and the Fraser standard?

Under the Fraser standard, school officials look not merely to the reasonable risk of disruption—the Tinker standard—but would also balance the freedom of a student's speech rights against the school's interest in teaching students the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior.

How the U.S. Supreme Court differentiated the speech in Tinker from that in Bethel?

The Court found that it was appropriate for the school to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language. Chief Justice Burger distinguished between political speech which the Court previously had protected in Tinker v.

What amendment is Tinker vs Des Moines?

The 1969 landmark case of Tinker v. Des Moines affirmed the First Amendment rights of students in school. The Court held that a school district violated students' free...

Why does wearing armbands fall within the protection?

The Supreme Court's Decision

The Court determined that the wearing of armbands was protected by the First Amendment's free speech clause. Justice Abe Fortas wrote the Court's opinion.

Who won the Levy case?

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of a teenager who was kicked off her school cheerleading squad over a profane social media post. In an 8-1 ruling, it concluded that the Mahanoy Area School District had violated Brandi Levy's freedom of speech under the First Amendment.

What was the cheerleader's vulgar message?

The message included an image of the student and a friend with their middle fingers raised, along with text expressing a similar sentiment. Using a curse word four times, the student expressed her dissatisfaction with “school,” “softball,” “cheer” and “everything.”

Who won Mahanoy v bl?

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit's ruling, holding that while public schools may have a special interest in regulating some off-campus student speech, the special interests offered by the Mahanoy Area School District were not sufficient to overcome B. L.'s ...

Is the Tinker vs Des Moines case still relevant today?

In each of these three decisions post-Tinker – Fraser, Hazelwood, and Morse – the Supreme Court ruled against public school students and in favor of school officials. However, the Tinker case still stands as the baseline rule for student-initiated speech that is not vulgar or lewd or promotes the illegal use of drugs.