Why did the Anti-Federalist oppose the U.S. Constitution signed in 1787?

Asked by: Stella Halvorson  |  Last update: October 13, 2025
Score: 4.9/5 (10 votes)

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the U.S. Constitution signed in 1787?

The Anti-Federalists

One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from.

What is one reason why Anti-Federalists did not trust the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution gave the new national government too much power and that this new government—led by a new group of distant, out-of-touch political elites—would seize all political power; swallow up the states—the governments that were closest to the people themselves; and abuse the ...

Why were the Anti-Federalists opposed to the ratification of the Constitution and how was their opposition partly overcome?

Anti-Federalists objected to the power the Constitution gave the federal government and the absence of a bill of rights to protect individual liberties. The Federalists countered that a strong government was necessary to lead the new nation and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution.

Why did Patrick Henry oppose the Constitution?

Henry feared Constitution would give federal government too much power.

Why wasn’t the Bill of Rights originally in the US Constitution? - James Coll

34 related questions found

How was Patrick Henry a anti federalist?

After the war Henry championed the cause of states' rights and lobbied unsuccessfully against the ratification of the United States Constitution. A staunch Anti-Federalist, he turned down George Washington's offer to become Secretary of State because of the President's strong Federalist leanings.

Why were some states unwilling to approve the Constitution?

Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms.

What was the significance of the Constitutional Convention of 1787?

The United States Constitution that emerged from the convention established a federal government with more specific powers, including those related to conducting relations with foreign governments.

What did the Anti-Federalists want added to the Constitution?

The Constitution was ratified, but some reservations surfaced about its content. A critical minority, referred to as Anti-Federalists, insisted upon the addition of a bill of rights that would protect the rights of individual citizens, and demanded a new look at some of the Constitution's specific provisions.

Was James Madison a federalist or Anti-Federalist?

Those who supported the Constitution were called Federalists; that included Madison.

Why did James Madison change his mind?

10, Madison also believed that a large republic would have many contending factions that would prevent a majority from violating the rights of minorities. Nevertheless, he began to change his mind. Madison was deeply concerned about the continuing strength of the Anti-Federalists after ratification.

Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the American Constitution Quizlet?

Antifederalists opposed the Constitution because their main fear was that it would cause the government to be corrupt since it was so distant from most people. Another worry was of the representatives being elites which would not be helpful for the middle and lower class.

What were the major differences between the federalist and Anti-Federalist and who were the best known members of each party?

The Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists, led by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, advocated states' rights instead of centralized power.

What are the arguments against federalism?

THE DRAWBACKS OF FEDERALISM. Federalism also comes with drawbacks. Chief among them are economic disparities across states, race-to-the-bottom dynamics (i.e., states compete to attract business by lowering taxes and regulations), and the difficulty of taking action on issues of national importance.

What was a problem for the Federalists in 1788?

In 1788, a significant problem for the Federalists was option C: Many states were not ready to ratify the Constitution. After the U.S. Constitution was drafted in 1787, it was sent to the states for ratification. However, many of the states were hesitant to approve it.

Why did the Anti-Federalists opposed the presidency?

During the ratification debates, Antifederalists charged that the President would become an elected monarch, that cabals would develop to ensure his reelection, and that the presidential veto power would be abused.

What was the main issue between the federalists and Anti-Federalists?

The Federalists contended that a stronger central government would provide a solid base from which New York could grow and prosper. The anti-Federalists clamored for a bill of rights and fought to preserve the autonomy of the state against federal encroachments.

What were the major disagreements between the federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification period over the need to amend the proposed Constitution?

Anti-Federalists argued for the value of limited central government, whereas Federalists maintained that natural rights to life, liberty, and property would be best protected under a strong central government.

What were the main concerns of the federalists and Anti-Federalists and how did these concerns shape the bill of rights?

The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one. In the end, popular sentiment was decisive.

Why were the federalists and anti-federalists at odds over the Constitution?

Federalists believed that a stronger national government would improve relationships between states and help create, as the Constitution stated, a “more perfect union.” Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, worried that a federal government with more power would be prone to tyranny.

What do you think caused some delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to be unwilling to let the people elect the president directly?

But in the deliberations leading up to its adoption, the delegates debated several different options for selecting the president of the United States. If the people were allowed to vote directly for president, many delegates feared that there would be numerous candidates receiving votes.

Why this event in 1787 was significant in U.S. history?

The fifty-five delegates who met in Philadelphia between May 25 and September 17, 1787, would not only reject the Articles of Confederation altogether, but they would produce the first written constitution for any nation in the history of the world.

Why wouldn t the Anti-Federalists approve the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Why were slaves counted as 3/5 of a whole person?

Viewed the opposite way, by including three-fifths of slaves in the legislative apportionment (even though they had no voting rights), the Three-fifths Compromise provided additional representation in the House of Representatives of slave states compared to the free states, if representation had been considered based ...

Is God mentioned in the Constitution?

In the United States, the federal constitution does not make a reference to God as such, although it uses the formula "the year of our Lord" in Article VII.