Why were slaves counted as 3/5 of a whole person?

Asked by: Dorothea Bartell  |  Last update: May 8, 2025
Score: 4.2/5 (5 votes)

Viewed the opposite way, by including three-fifths of slaves in the legislative apportionment (even though they had no voting rights), the Three-fifths Compromise provided additional representation in the House of Representatives of slave states compared to the free states, if representation had been considered based ...

Why were slaves counted as 3/5 of a person?

Article one, section two of the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation. The "Three-Fifths Clause" thus increased the political power of slaveholding states.

Why was it 3:5 and not 1/2?

Most of the south was for the counting of slaves and most of the north was opposed. Finally the founders concluded that every free person should be counted and that 3/5 of the slaves would be counted. This 3/5 was also used in fixing the amount of money to be raised in each state by a direct tax.

How did they decide on 3-5?

The Continental Congress debated the ratio of slaves to free persons at great length. Northerners favored a 4-to-3 ratio, while southerners favored a 2-to-1 or 4-to-1 ratio. Finally, James Madison suggested a compromise: a 5-to-3 ratio. All but two states--New Hampshire and Rhode Island--approved this recommendation.

What percentage of a person were slaves?

There were almost 700 thousand slaves in the US in 1790, which equated to approximately 18 percent of the total population, or roughly one in every six people.

The 3/5 Compromise - One Minute History

26 related questions found

Are black people still considered 3-5?

It's out of date. Slaves (black people) in the US *were* counted as 3/5 of a free (white) person before and during the Civil War. When slavery was abolished at the end of the Civil War, each free male citizen of the US counted as one person (for establishing the number of representatives a state had in Congress).

What is the 3 5th law?

It determined that three out of every five slaves were counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxation. Before the Civil War, the Three-Fifths Compromise gave a disproportionate representation of slave states in the House of Representatives.

How did they come up with 3 5 of a person?

The three-fifths ratio originated with an amendment proposed to the Articles of Confederation on April 18, 1783. The amendment was to have changed the basis for determining the wealth of each state, and hence its tax obligations, from real estate to population, as a measure of ability to produce wealth.

What were the three-fifths of the slaves counted for?

Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

When was the 3 5 clause overturned?

The End of the Three-Fifths Compromise

The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery. But it took the passage and ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment on July 9, 1868, for the three-fifths clause to be stricken.

Who did not want slaves to be counted in the census?

Final answer: Delegates from non-slaveholding states did not want slaves to be counted in the census due to the belief that it would lead to unequal representation in Congress. Southern states, in contrast, argued for their inclusion to increase their representation.

What did the original Constitution say about slavery?

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1, is one of a handful of provisions in the original Constitution related to slavery, though it does not use the word “slave.” This Clause prohibited the federal government from limiting the importation of “persons” (understood at the time to mean primarily enslaved African persons) where ...

What was the Missouri Act?

The Missouri Compromise represents a major milestone in American history. Passed by Congress on March 3, 1820, the compromise temporarily settled a divisive national debate over whether new states would permit or prohibit slavery.

Why were slaves not counted as an entire person for representation in the government?

The Southern states wanted to count the entire slave population. This would increase their number of members of Congress. The Northern delegates and others opposed to slavery wanted to count only free persons, including free blacks in the North and South.

How were enslaved people counted in the census?

The Federal Constitution stipulated that a slave counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and apportionment of the House of Representatives. Only the heads of free households appear in these records. All others, including slaves, are noted statistically under the head of household or reported owner.

Was the Three-Fifths Compromise good or bad?

The three-fifths compromise gave the slave states more representation, but not as much as counting a slave as one, and not less than not counting them. For both sides, this was better than the alternative.

What percentage of the US population were slaves in 1776?

While accurate numbers are hard to come by, the American population at the time was approximately 2.1 million; free blacks comprised 2.4 percent of the overall population, and slaves formed 21.5 percent. Fact #2: They Served from First to Last.

Why was Patrick Henry not happy with the Constitution?

Henry, the leading anti-federalist, opposed ratification of the Constitution because he believed that it would create a government that was too distant and powerful; his opposition played a very large role in encouraging the adoption of the Bill of Rights.

What would have happened without the 3-5 compromise?

James Madison believed in the direct election of the president but created the Electoral College, which, with the three-fifths clause in place, gave the South great power in presidential elections. Without the three-fifths clause, Thomas Jefferson would have been defeated for the presidency in 1800.

Why did they decide on 3 5?

Northerners didn't want slaves to be counted since it would give more power to the South. Southerns wanted them to be counted for the same reason. Eventually, they compromised on it, deciding to count 3 out of 5 of the slaves.

Who came up with 2 2 5?

Two Plus Two Make Five (1895), by Alphonse Allais, is a collection of absurdist short stories about anti-intellectualism as politics. The phrase has been used in various contexts since 1728, and is best known from the 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell.

Why did the Great Compromise and the three-fifths?

The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled matters of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans. The Electoral College settled how the president would be elected.

Were slaves considered 3/5 of a person?

At its most basic, the three-fifths clause stipulated that three-fifths of the enslaved population of a state would be counted alongside five-fifths of the free population for determining how many members in the House of Representatives each state received.

What is the 4th rule of law?

The rule of law is a durable system of laws, institutions, norms, and community commitment that delivers four universal principles: accountability, just law, open government, and accessible and impartial justice.

Why did the South want slaves to be counted as part of their population?

By counting slaves as part of their population, the South could increase the number of representatives they had in Congress. This would give them a greater say in the decision-making process and ensure that their interests were adequately represented.