Can a judge override the law?
Asked by: Lavina Macejkovic | Last update: February 16, 2026Score: 4.4/5 (35 votes)
No, a judge cannot simply override the law but can interpret it, declare laws unconstitutional (judicial review), modify certain rulings (like jury verdicts or prior orders on discretion), or refuse to enforce statutes, but ultimately must follow the legal framework, with higher courts reviewing lower court decisions and the legislature able to change laws. Judges apply laws, but their power lies in interpretation, deciding constitutionality, and managing discretion within bounds, not creating law or ignoring it.
Can a judge overrule a law?
But the federal judiciary has no authority to alter or annul a statute. The power of judicial review is more limited: It allows a court to decline to enforce a statute, and to enjoin the executive from enforcing that statute.
Who has more power than a judge?
While judges hold significant authority in court, others wield different forms of power, including Legislators (Congress) who make laws judges interpret, the President who enforces them and appoints judges, Prosecutors (DAs) who heavily influence case outcomes through charging decisions, and even Juries who determine facts, all operating within a system of checks and balances where power is distributed, not absolute.
Can a judge overrule a case?
When a Judge Can Overturn a Jury Verdict. If a jury returns a $10 million verdict in a case that clearly is only worth $10,000.00, then the judge can overturn that. This would be on the grounds of the jury award being excessive. Likewise in some states if the jury award is inadequate the judge may overturn the verdict.
Can a judge overturn a judgement?
The reversal of a jury's verdict by a judge occurs when the judge believes that there were insufficient facts on which to base the jury's verdict or that the verdict did not correctly apply the law.
Can Case Law Override Statutory Law in Legal Proceedings? - Justice System Explained
Who is more powerful, a judge or a jury?
Moreover, judges' fact-finding decisions are typically framed as “norm enforcement” and assumed to be more rational and objective than those of jurors.
Who can overturn a law?
The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
What is a judge not allowed to do?
Judges are prohibited from engaging in improper conduct that compromises fairness, impartiality, or integrity, including accepting bribes, showing bias (based on race, gender, etc.), discussing cases privately with one side, using their office for personal gain, making political endorsements, or acting rudely, and must recuse themselves from conflicts of interest, all while upholding the law and avoiding the appearance of impropriety.
What if a judge is unfair?
A motion to recuse is a legal motion that asks the court to remove a judge from a case because they may be biased. A motion to recuse a judge can be filed by the prosecutor, the defense attorney, or the plaintiff or defendant in either a criminal or civil case.
Can a judge go back and change his ruling?
The request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision. The Judge may also reconsider a decision on his or her own initiative.
Are judges ever held accountable?
Oversight mechanisms work together to hold judges and Judiciary staff responsible for their conduct as government officials and for the management of public resources.
Who is the boss over a judge?
The California Commission on Judicial Performance oversees the professional and personal conduct of judges and justices. All judges and justices must comply with the California Code of Judicial Ethics, which contains standards for ethical conduct.
Are judges more powerful than lawyers?
A judge has more inherent power in the courtroom because they are the impartial referee, controlling proceedings, ruling on evidence, instructing juries, and issuing sentences, while a lawyer's power comes from advocacy for their client, operating within the judge's established rules. However, the prosecutor often wields significant influence (sometimes seen as almost equal to the judge) through charging decisions, shifting the power balance in practice, say some sources.
Who has more power over a judge?
While judges hold significant authority in court, others wield different forms of power, including Legislators (Congress) who make laws judges interpret, the President who enforces them and appoints judges, Prosecutors (DAs) who heavily influence case outcomes through charging decisions, and even Juries who determine facts, all operating within a system of checks and balances where power is distributed, not absolute.
Can a judge violate your constitutional rights?
Barker, the Supreme Court has held that judges lack immunity from prosecution for violating constitutional rights under 18 U.S.C. § 242 because Congress acted to proscribe criminal conduct by judges in the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
Can you sue a judge for a ruling?
In essence, absolute immunity provides these officials with freedom from lawsuits, allowing them to invoke this protection through pretrial motions. For instance, judges and judicial officers in California enjoy a broad scope of absolute immunity that remains intact, even in light of the state's tort claims act.
What not to say to a judge in court?
You should not say anything sarcastic, interrupt the judge, lie, use slang, make personal attacks on others, guarantee outcomes, or speak about things not relevant to the case; instead, remain respectful, address the judge as "Your Honor," answer only the question asked, and be direct and truthful to maintain credibility.
Has anyone ever successfully sued a judge?
Notable Case Examples. For instance, there was a case where a federal judge was successfully sued for sexual harassment – an act considered outside his official duties. Another example involved a judge who was sued for defamation after making false statements about an attorney during a press conference.
What is considered unethical behavior by a judge?
Common complaints of ethical misconduct include improper demeanour; failure to properly disqualify when the judge has a conflict of interest; engaging in ex parte communication and failure to execute their judicial duties in a timely fashion. Behaviour outside of the courtroom can also be at issue.
What is the hardest case to win in court?
The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, like crimes against children or sexual assault, where jurors struggle with bias; complex, voluminous evidence, such as white-collar fraud; and defenses that challenge societal norms, like an insanity plea, which faces high scrutiny and conflicting expert testimony. Cases with weak physical evidence, uncooperative witnesses (like in sex crimes), or those involving unpopular defendants (e.g., child abusers) are particularly challenging for defense attorneys.
What annoys a judge?
Other judges said they dislike personal attacks, snide remarks, innuendo, or sarcasm. One judge said his or her biggest pet peeve is “the growing tendency to wax personal in responding to arguments.” Unorganized briefs.
How to prove a judge is biased?
Proving judicial bias involves documenting specific, objective actions or statements showing prejudice (not just rulings you dislike), filing a formal motion for recusal with an affidavit detailing facts and reasons (often requiring a certificate of good faith), and preserving the issue for appeal by objecting during the proceedings, all while focusing on evidence like transcripts and decisions, ideally with an attorney's guidance. The standard looks for bias from an "extrajudicial source" (outside the case) that a reasonable person would find concerning, not just a judge's rulings.
Do judges have more power than the president?
Federal laws, for example, are passed by Congress and signed by the President. The judicial branch, in turn, has the authority to decide the constitutionality of federal laws and resolve other cases involving federal laws. But judges depend upon the executive branch to enforce court decisions.
Who has the power to nullify a law?
Nullification and the Supreme Court. Definition: The theory that the states are the final arbiters of the limits of national authority and that each may veto the enforcement of federal laws it determines to be unconstitutional, at least within its own boundaries.
What is the Article 111 of the Constitution?
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.