Can a judge reduce a jury's award?

Asked by: Prof. Ara Boehm  |  Last update: February 11, 2026
Score: 4.5/5 (13 votes)

Yes, a judge can reduce a jury's award through a process called remittitur, if the award is deemed excessive, shocks the conscience, or appears influenced by prejudice, by offering the plaintiff the choice of accepting the reduced amount or facing a new trial on damages; judges also have the authority to reduce awards due to statutory caps or lack of evidentiary support, effectively replacing the jury's judgment with their own assessment of a reasonable figure.

Can a judge reduce a jury award?

After the jury announces its verdict, the defendant can file a motion asking the judge to reduce the award. Judges grant remittitur when they believe the jury's damage award shocked the conscience, was influenced by passion or prejudice, or substantially exceeded awards in comparable cases.

Has a judge ever overrule a jury verdict?

Yes, judges can and do overturn jury verdicts, though it's rare, usually when there's insufficient evidence for the verdict, the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (showing passion or prejudice), or due to significant legal errors during the trial, allowing for motions like Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) or ordering a new trial, especially in criminal cases where a conviction might be overturned but not an acquittal. 

Can a judge change the decision of a jury?

Yes, a judge can overrule or set aside a jury's verdict, but it's rare and only happens under specific legal circumstances, like when there's insufficient evidence to support the verdict, the jury misapplied the law, or damages are grossly excessive, using mechanisms like a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) or Judgment of Acquittal. Judges must respect jury decisions, so they generally only intervene when a verdict is clearly unreasonable or against the law, not simply because they disagree with the outcome.
 

Can a judge overrule a grand jury indictment?

Yes, but it's very rare and only for specific, serious reasons like prosecutorial misconduct or constitutional violations, not simply disagreeing with the grand jury's finding of probable cause; a judge can't overrule an indictment based on the sufficiency of the evidence, as that's the grand jury's role, but might dismiss it if the process itself was fundamentally flawed.
 

Can a NY Jury Award You More Money Than You Ask For? Attorney Gerry Oginski Explains

45 related questions found

Who has more power, a judge or jury?

In federal court, the jury decides the verdict. It's the judge's job to act as referee, ruling on issues of law before and during the trial. Federal judges keep up to date on many laws and rules such as: Federal Laws.

Can charges be dropped after indictment?

Yes, criminal charges can be dropped after an indictment, though it's less common and often requires significant legal action or a change in the prosecution's assessment, usually through prosecutorial discretion or a defense lawyer's motion to dismiss. Reasons include insufficient evidence, constitutional violations, new exculpatory evidence, witness issues, or successful defense arguments that make a conviction unlikely, leading prosecutors to drop charges for justice or efficiency. 

Can a judge go back and change his ruling?

The request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision. The Judge may also reconsider a decision on his or her own initiative.

Can a judge direct a jury to acquit?

However, judges can direct juries to acquit a defendant to prevent a miscarriage of justice if they see no evidence of guilt. And a jury can't be punished for delivering a verdict of acquittal, even if it seems against the evidence of a case.

How often is the jury wrong?

The identification error is similarly one-sided, always. From the observed agreement rates, the probability of a correct verdict by the jury is estimated at 87% for the NCSC cases and 89% for the Kalven-Zeisel cases. Those accuracy rates correspond to error rates of 1 in 8 and 1 in 9, respectively.

Has a judge ever disagreed with a jury?

Disagreeing 25 to 50 percent of the time

One judge explained that he or she may disagree with the jury's verdict but can't rule any differently if that disagreement stemmed from facts not in evidence.

What if one juror disagrees?

If one juror disagrees in a criminal trial, it often leads to a hung jury (deadlocked jury) and a mistrial, meaning no verdict is reached and the prosecutor might retry the case or drop charges, but in some states (like Oregon historically), a non-unanimous vote could still convict, although federal cases and most states require unanimous verdicts for criminal convictions. In civil cases, requirements vary by state, but often fewer than 12 jurors agree, and some states allow non-unanimous verdicts, but a complete deadlock still results in a mistrial. 

Can judges overrule a jury verdict?

Yes, a judge can overrule or set aside a jury's verdict, but it's rare and only happens under specific legal circumstances, like when there's insufficient evidence to support the verdict, the jury misapplied the law, or damages are grossly excessive, using mechanisms like a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) or Judgment of Acquittal. Judges must respect jury decisions, so they generally only intervene when a verdict is clearly unreasonable or against the law, not simply because they disagree with the outcome.
 

Do juries award damages?

The jury is then responsible for determining what amount of damages, if any, will be awarded to the plaintiff. When they do this, they will be awarding a verdict as opposed to a settlement.

What factors impact a judge's decision?

with the judge's individual temperament, personal impulses, and lifelong experiences, create a predisposition whereby certain judges are inclined to arrive at certain decisions.

Who has more power than a judge?

While judges hold significant authority in court, others wield different forms of power, including Legislators (Congress) who make laws judges interpret, the President who enforces them and appoints judges, Prosecutors (DAs) who heavily influence case outcomes through charging decisions, and even Juries who determine facts, all operating within a system of checks and balances where power is distributed, not absolute.
 

What is a judge not allowed to do?

Judges are prohibited from engaging in improper conduct that compromises fairness, impartiality, or integrity, including accepting bribes, showing bias (based on race, gender, etc.), discussing cases privately with one side, using their office for personal gain, making political endorsements, or acting rudely, and must recuse themselves from conflicts of interest, all while upholding the law and avoiding the appearance of impropriety.
 

Do judges regret their decisions?

Judges have second thoughts about their past decisions far more often than is admitted, so failing to consider those regrets paints an inaccurate picture of how the legal system functions, according to "Judicial Regrets" by Brooklyn Law School professor Yuvraj Joshi.

Who is more powerful, a judge or a jury?

Moreover, judges' fact-finding decisions are typically framed as “norm enforcement” and assumed to be more rational and objective than those of jurors.

What happens if a judge disagrees with a jury's decision?

In American state courts, JNOV is the practice whereby the presiding judge in a civil jury trial may overrule the decision of a jury and reverse or amend their verdict. In literal terms, the judge enters a judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict.

What is the longest jury verdict?

Longest Jury Deliberation

In 1992, a civil jury in California deliberated for four and a half months before returning a $22.5 million verdict in favor of a woman and her son who sued the City of Long Beach for preventing them from opening a chain of residential homes for Alzheimer's patients.

What is the most popular reason that cases get dismissed?

The most common reasons cases get dismissed involve insufficient evidence for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and violations of the defendant's constitutional rights (like illegal searches or seizures), making key evidence inadmissible, alongside issues like witness unavailability, procedural errors, or prosecutorial discretion where charges are dropped due to lack of interest or resources, especially in criminal matters. In civil cases, settlements often lead to dismissal before trial. 

What to say to a prosecutor to drop charges?

To ask a prosecutor to drop charges, you (or the defendant's attorney) must formally request it, often by submitting a sworn "Affidavit of Non-Prosecution" explaining your reasons, but the prosecutor holds the final decision, not the victim or defendant, especially in serious cases like domestic violence, as they weigh the public interest and evidence. Key steps involve gathering evidence showing weak points, documenting your request clearly (especially if you're the victim), and working with an attorney to present a strong case for dismissal, often through motions or negotiations.