How to write a scope of review?

Asked by: Michele Blick  |  Last update: June 29, 2026
Score: 4.9/5 (65 votes)

Writing a scope of review involves defining the exact boundaries of your investigation. To do this clearly, you should outline your core objectives, detail your inclusion and exclusion criteria (such as timeframes, geographies, and demographics), specify your data sources or methodologies, and explicitly state any limitations.

How to write a scope review?

On this page

  1. Identifying a Team.
  2. Step 1: Identifying the Research Question.
  3. Step 2: Identifying Relevant Studies.
  4. Step 3: Selecting Studies to Be Included in the Review.
  5. Step 4: Charting the Data.
  6. Step 5: Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results.
  7. Step 6: Consulting Stakeholders (Optional)
  8. Summary.

What is the scope of a review?

A scoping review is a type of literature review that maps the existing research on a broad topic to identify key concepts, theories, and evidence gaps. It uses a systematic, transparent method to assess the volume and nature of research, often serving as a preliminary step before a full systematic review.

What is an example of scope?

A project scope defines the boundaries of a project, detailing specific goals, deliverables, and tasks to be completed, while explicitly listing exclusions to prevent work creep. An example for a website project includes developing the homepage, building a contact form, and optimizing for mobile, while excluding content creation for the blog.

What are the 5 stages of a scoping review?

This is the most commonly used framework for scoping reviews,41 and involves stages of (1) identifying the RQ, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting study, (4) charting the data, (5) collating, summarising and reporting and (6) consultation.

Scoping Review A Step By Step Guide- Dr. Hassaan Tohid

32 related questions found

How to do a scoping review step by step?

Scoping reviews are systematic, transparent methods to map key concepts, evidence, and gaps in a research area. Key steps include identifying research questions, developing and registering a protocol, searching databases, selecting studies, charting data, and reporting results, often following Arksey and O'Malley’s framework.

Can ChatGPT write my literature review?

Using ChatGPT to write a literature review can greatly facilitate the research process. By following a step-by-step approach, researchers can effectively leverage ChatGPT's capabilities to gather insights, generate content, and enhance the quality of their literature review.

How do I write a scope?

8 key steps to developing a project scope statement

  1. Understand why the project was initiated. ...
  2. Define the key objectives of the project. ...
  3. Outline the project statement of work. ...
  4. Identify major deliverables. ...
  5. Select key milestones. ...
  6. Identify major constraints. ...
  7. List scope exclusions. ...
  8. Obtain sign-off.

What is scope in simple words?

Scope refers to the total range, extent, or boundary of a project, topic, or activity. It defines what is included and what is excluded, essentially acting as the "fence" around a task to determine its limits and size.

What are the 5 steps of defining scope?

How to define project scope step-by-step.

  • Establish crystal-clear goals and objectives. ...
  • Gather and document stakeholder requirements. ...
  • Identify and document deliverables. ...
  • Create a work breakdown structure (WBS). ...
  • Define exclusions and constraints. ...
  • Obtain stakeholder buy-in. ...
  • Establish a change control process.

What is the difference between standard of review and scope of review?

In theory, how the Court of Appeals defines its job in a particular case should depend on the interplay between the “scope of review” and the applicable “standard of review.” Roughly, the scope of review establishes the set of issues before the court, and the standard of review establishes the criteria that are applied ...

How to write a scoping review introduction?

Writers find only two items to guide them: we are to “describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known… and explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach”; and we should provide “an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed ...

What should be included in a scoping review?

A scoping review maps existing literature on a topic by following a systematic approach: defining research questions, developing a protocol, conducting comprehensive searches, selecting studies, charting data, and summarizing results. Key components include rigorous eligibility criteria, transparent searching, and reporting using PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

What is the scope of review?

A review scope (or scoping review) is a research method used to map, explore, and synthesize the existing literature on a broad topic to identify key concepts, theories, and evidence gaps. It provides a comprehensive overview of a topic, aiming to outline the scope or extent of available research without necessarily conducting a detailed quality appraisal of each study.

What is an example of a scoping review question?

Examples of systematic review and scoping review questions

Example: "In people with multiple sclerosis, what is the extent to which a walking intervention, compared to no intervention, improves self-report fatigue?"

How to write an abstract for a scoping review?

Structure the abstract and include (as applicable): background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, quality assessment and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions, implications of key findings, and scoping review registration number.

What are the 5 C's of literature review?

The five Cs to writing a literature review are cite, compare, contrast, critique, and connect.

Is it legal to use ChatGPT for research paper?

Using AI writing tools (like ChatGPT) to write your essay is usually considered plagiarism and may result in penalization, unless it is allowed by your university. Text generated by AI tools is based on existing texts and therefore cannot provide unique insights.

What to avoid when writing a literature review?

Most common errors and how to avoid them

  • Wrong sources. Using incorrect or irrelevant sources is a frequent mistake that can undermine the credibility of a literature review. ...
  • Unfocused searches. ...
  • Plagiarism. ...
  • Not starting on time. ...
  • Not identifying the research gap.

Is a scoping review difficult?

An additional challenge in conducting a scoping review relates to large numbers of included sources of evidence, the volume of data to be extracted and the complexity of the planned analyses [15].

Can Chatgpt do a literature review?

Additionally, a literature review typically requires a comprehensive analysis of multiple sources, so the generated response may not cover all relevant studies. Nonetheless, it can assist in providing a basic literature review on a given topic, which will need human authors to add to and edit it.

What is the protocol for scoping review?

A scoping review protocol is a detailed, pre-planned document outlining the objectives, methods, and reporting plan for a review, typically following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework or the JBI Manual. It is highly recommended to register protocols (e.g., on Open Science Framework) to reduce bias, enhance transparency, and avoid duplication.

How many hours does it take to do a scoping review?

Time estimates vary widely for the completion of a scoping review, but most estimates say that a scoping review takes 6-12 months to complete.

What is the difference between a review and a scoping review?

A key difference between scoping reviews and systematic reviews is that in terms of a review question, a scoping review will have a broader “scope” than traditional systematic reviews with correspondingly more expansive inclusion criteria.

How many articles are needed for a scoping review?

We suggest a working definition for large scoping reviews, involving around 100 evidence sources, but emphasize the need to consider factors like data volume, analysis complexity, and purpose.