What are common reasons for mistrials?

Asked by: Miss Stacy D'Amore I  |  Last update: March 31, 2026
Score: 4.5/5 (31 votes)

Common reasons for mistrials include hung juries (inability to agree on a verdict), juror misconduct (like outside research or bias), attorney misconduct (prejudicial comments or actions), improperly admitted evidence, and unforeseen emergencies (death, illness, or natural disasters affecting a key participant like a judge, juror, or attorney). These issues disrupt the trial's fairness, preventing a just outcome and requiring a fresh start.

What is the most common reason a judge declares a mistrial?

A mistrial may be declared for a number of reasons. One of the most common reasons for a judge to declare one is due to a hung jury. A “hung jury” is when a jury deadlocks after lengthy deliberations and can't come to a unanimous decision on the defendant's guilt or innocence.

What is the hardest case to win in court?

The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, complex evidence, or specific defenses like insanity, with sexual assault, crimes against children, and white-collar crimes frequently cited as challenging due to juror bias, weak physical evidence, or technical complexity. The insanity defense is notoriously difficult because it shifts the burden of proof and faces public skepticism. 

What would constitute a mistrial?

A mistrial occurs when a jury is unable to reach a verdict and there must be a new trial with a new jury; or there is a serious procedural error or misconduct that would result in an unfair trial, and the judge adjourns the case without a decision on the merits and awards a new trial.

How common is a mistrial?

Nationally, studies show that about 5–7% of criminal jury trials end in mistrial, most often because jurors can't agree on a verdict (a “hung jury”). Florida's rates are estimated to be similar, with hung juries being the most common reason. United States (National Avg.)

What Are Common Reasons For A Mistrial? - CountyOffice.org

43 related questions found

Who benefits from a mistrial?

Prejudicial Comments: If inadmissible evidence or prejudicial statements are made during the trial. Pros: Opportunity to Correct Mistakes: A mistrial provides the plaintiff a chance to address any weaknesses in their case, gather additional evidence, or correct legal errors before the retrial.

What makes you less likely to be picked for jury duty?

You're less likely to be picked for jury duty if you have strong biases, connections to the case, significant personal hardships (like caring for a child or elderly person), certain occupations (like law enforcement), are over 70, have served recently, or can't understand English well, as attorneys look for impartial jurors but may excuse those with undue hardship or strong reasons they can't serve fairly. Being evasive or showing you can't follow instructions also gets you removed, while expressing strong opinions or having unique life experiences often makes you a target for removal by lawyers. 

Does a person go free after a mistrial?

No, a mistrial does not automatically mean the defendant goes free; it just means the current trial is terminated without a verdict, leaving the charges unresolved, and the prosecution can choose to retry the case with a new jury or, less commonly, drop the charges, as a mistrial isn't an acquittal. It's like hitting the reset button, not ending the game. 

Can a judge overrule a mistrial?

Likewise, since a prior ruling ordinarily no longer has any legal effect after a mistrial is declared, the rule that one superior court judge may not overrule another does not apply and the judge at retrial is free to rule anew.

Who benefits most from a hung jury?

And a loss for the government is almost always a win for the defendant. How big a win depends on the defendant's individual circumstances. There are several ways that a defendant may benefit from a hung jury. First, the government may choose not to have a second trial and may dismiss the case instead.

What is the stupidest court case?

We all know the most famous frivolous lawsuit story. Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's back in 1992 when she spilled hot coffee on herself. "But coffee is meant to be hot" we all cry. Dig a little deeper into the case however and it starts to look less frivolous.

Which lawyer wins most cases?

There's no single lawyer universally crowned as having won the most cases, as records are hard to track, but American trial lawyer Gerry Spence is legendary for never losing a criminal case and not losing a civil case for decades, while Guyanese lawyer Sir Lionel Luckhoo famously achieved 245 successive murder-charge acquittals, a world record. Other highly successful figures include India's Harish Salve and figures like Joe Jamail, known for huge verdicts, but the definition of "winning" varies across legal fields. 

What happens to 90% of court cases?

According to the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance, "The overwhelming majority (90 to 95 percent) of cases result in plea bargaining."

Has a judge ever overrule a jury verdict?

Yes, judges can and do overturn jury verdicts, though it's rare, usually when there's insufficient evidence for the verdict, the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (showing passion or prejudice), or due to significant legal errors during the trial, allowing for motions like Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) or ordering a new trial, especially in criminal cases where a conviction might be overturned but not an acquittal. 

How many times can a judge declare a mistrial?

Theoretically as many times as they want. The new trial happens in front of a completely different jury though. They start over from the beginning with selecting a new jury. Realistically, it's very rare to go more than 1-2 times.

What happens after two mistrials?

Let's say the second jury also cannot reach a unanimous verdict and the court grants a second mistrial. Well, the government can keep taking the case to trial—in theory—until a jury reaches either a unanimous acquittal or a unanimous guilty verdict.

Who is more powerful, a judge or a jury?

Neither the jury nor the judge is universally "more powerful"; they have distinct roles, but in most criminal trials, the jury holds the ultimate power to decide guilt or innocence (the verdict), while the judge controls the legal process, determines what evidence is admitted, and imposes the sentence. The jury acts as the finder of fact and applies the law as instructed, but the judge ensures fairness, manages evidence (ruling on objections), and interprets the law, making them powerful in shaping the trial's direction and outcome.
 

What justifies a mistrial?

Beyond jury deadlock, several other circumstances can justify a mistrial: Juror misconduct, like discussing the case outside of deliberations. Procedural mistakes that harm one side's ability to present evidence. Introduction of inadmissible and highly prejudicial material.

What is the hardest criminal case to beat?

The "hardest" criminal case is subjective, but generally involves first-degree murder, crimes against vulnerable people (like children), or complex white-collar/sex crimes due to severe penalties, emotional jury bias, intense forensic evidence, and the difficulty of proving premeditation or intent, with some lawyers citing cases involving uncooperative witnesses or unique defense arguments as exceptionally tough. 

What happens if a jury is hung three times?

In other words, just because there is a hung jury doesn't mean the case goes away. I've seen a case tried three times before there was finally a verdict on the case. So, the prosecutors can choose whether they want to re-try it, but then the judge can still dismiss the case.

What is the most common reason that a judge declares a mistrial?

Deadlocked ("Hung") Jury

The most common reason for a mistrial is a hung jury. In California criminal cases, the jury's verdict must be unanimous, meaning all twelve jurors must agree on the defendant's guilt or innocence. If jurors cannot reach a consensus after extensive deliberation, they are considered deadlocked.

Who would most likely be dismissed as a juror?

People most likely to be dismissed from jury duty are those with hardships (financial, medical, family caregiving), legal disqualifications (non-citizen, felon, non-English speaker), or those who show clear bias or inability to be impartial during questioning, often related to personal experiences with the justice system or specific case types. Lawyers use strikes to remove jurors who seem to favor one side or can't follow the law, while courts excuse others for significant burdens like being a primary caregiver or elderly. 

What to say during jury selection to not get picked?

To avoid being picked for jury duty, you can request a deferral or excuse for valid reasons like hardship (financial, family care), health issues, or pre-booked travel, by contacting the court with documentation. During selection, honestly disclose biases or strong opinions, or mention connections to legal fields or the case, as attorneys often dismiss jurors with strong leanings or potential conflicts to ensure impartiality. 

What are two things jurors should never do?

Two critical things jurors should never do are research the case or visit the scene independently, and discuss the case with anyone outside the jury, including family, friends, or on social media, to ensure the verdict relies solely on evidence presented in court. Violating these rules, like becoming an "amateur detective" or getting outside opinions, can lead to a mistrial because it introduces biased information, according to the California Courts website and the Western District of Pennsylvania court guide.