What is rule 17 in Massachusetts?

Asked by: Sherwood Shanahan  |  Last update: April 23, 2026
Score: 5/5 (22 votes)

In Massachusetts, Rule 17 generally refers to the process in criminal cases for a defendant to request court-ordered subpoenas for third-party records (like phone, work, or medical records) not readily available, requiring the defense to show the documents are essential and not obtainable otherwise before trial. It also refers to Appellate Procedure Rule 17, about amicus curiae briefs, and Superior Court Rule 17, concerning recording devices, but the criminal procedure rule for obtaining evidence is the most common meaning in criminal defense contexts.

What is the rule 17 in Massachusetts?

Rule 17 is the process where a lawyer can ask the Court for a summons for third party records. To make a showing to acquire third party records a defendant must establish the following: A party moving to summons documents pursuant to Mass.

What is a rule 17 hearing?

Subpoena. In every criminal case, the prosecuting attorneys and the defendant have the right to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of tangible evidence by service upon them of a subpoena to appear for examination as a witness upon the trial or other hearing.

Can you move out at 17 in MA?

If you are under the age of 18, you do not have the legal capacity to enter into a contract or a rental agreement unless you are an “emancipated minor.” To become an emancipated minor you must go through a court process where the court legally declares you an adult.

What is the rule of appellate procedure 17 in Massachusetts?

A brief of an amicus curiae may be filed only (1) by leave of the Appellate Division or (2) at the request of the Appellate Division, except that consent or leave shall not be required when the brief is presented by the Commonwealth. The brief may be conditionally filed with the motion for leave.

What is Rule 17 Discovery in a Massachusetts Criminal Case?

24 related questions found

How long before a debt becomes uncollectible in Massachusetts?

In Massachusetts, the statute of limitations for most consumer debts, including written and oral contracts and credit cards, is six years, starting from the date the contract was breached (e.g., last payment). If a creditor obtains a court judgment, this period extends to 20 years, allowing for longer collection efforts. Be cautious, as making payments or acknowledging old debts can "reset" the clock, giving collectors renewed time to sue, notes. 

On what grounds can a case be appealed?

Grounds for appeal are the specific legal reasons a party claims a lower court made a significant error, justifying a higher court to review and potentially overturn the decision, commonly involving errors of law (wrong rules applied), procedural errors (unfair process), constitutional violations (rights denied), insufficient evidence, jury misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, or sentencing issues. These grounds must be clearly stated and demonstrate how the error unfairly prejudiced the outcome.
 

Can my parents stop me from leaving the house at 17?

Yes, at 17, you are still legally a minor, so your parents generally can stop you from moving out by reporting you as a runaway, which leads to police intervention to return you home unless there's proven abuse or neglect, or if you get legally emancipated, which is a complex court process proving financial independence. While you can't legally rent or sign contracts alone, you might find temporary solutions with family or in specific situations where authorities deem home unsafe, but your parents retain custody until you're 18. 

What is the legal age a child can stay home alone in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts doesn't set a specific age at which a child can be left home alone. In Massachusetts, such issues are decided on a case-by-case basis.

Can my parents call the cops if I leave at 17?

Since you are under 18, legally you are still considered a minor and your parents have custody over you. If you leave home without permission, your mother could report you as a runaway and the police would attempt to locate you and likely return you home if found.

What is the purpose of Rule 17?

Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure deals with subpoenas. Subdivision (f)(2) as proposed by the Supreme Court provides: The witness whose deposition is to be taken may be required by subpoena to attend at any place designated by the trial court. B.

What is the hardest case to win in court?

The hardest cases to win in court often involve high emotional stakes, complex evidence, or specific defenses like insanity, with sexual assault, crimes against children, and white-collar crimes frequently cited as challenging due to juror bias, weak physical evidence, or technical complexity. The insanity defense is notoriously difficult because it shifts the burden of proof and faces public skepticism. 

What is the Rule of 17?

THE RULE OF 17: When partner opens 2 or 2 , add your HCP to your number of trumps (partner's suit). If the total is less than 17, there is no game. If the total is 17 or more, you can explore game.

Can I sue someone for recording me without my permission in Massachusetts?

Yes, in Massachusetts, you can likely sue someone for secretly recording you without your consent because it's an "all-party consent" state with strict laws (Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99) that protect conversations and communications where there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, allowing for civil lawsuits, punitive damages, and attorney's fees, though public places usually have no expectation of privacy, and recordings of police activity have First Amendment protections. 

Is it better to seal or expunge your record?

It's generally better to get a record expunged if you qualify, as it erases the record, making it as if it never happened and completely removing it from most background checks. Sealing a record hides it from public view, but law enforcement and some government agencies can still access it with a court order, making expungement the superior, though often harder to get, option for a truly clean slate. 

At what age can a child refuse to see a parent in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts law does not specify a particular age at which a child can refuse visitation with a parent. Instead, the courts operate under the principle that custody and visitation decisions must serve the best interests of the child.

Can I leave my 7 year old home alone for 30 minutes?

Leaving a 7-year-old home alone for 30 minutes is generally not recommended by child safety experts like Safe Kids Worldwide, who suggest children under 12 shouldn't be left alone, though some parents and guidelines suggest it might be okay for very mature children for very brief times (like a quick walk around the block), but it depends heavily on the child's maturity, your local laws (which vary widely or don't exist), and your comfort level with potential emergencies like someone at the door or a fire, as they lack experience handling such crises. 

What age can a child look after their siblings?

There's no legal age a child can babysit – but if you leave your children with someone who's under 16 you're still responsible for their wellbeing. You should also think carefully about leaving your child alone with an older brother or sister. If they fall out, you won't be around to make the peace.

Can DCF take my child without a court order?

Yes, DCFS can take your child if they believe that your child is in danger of abuse or neglect. DCFS is responsible for investigating reports of child abuse and neglect in California. DCFS has the authority to remove a child from their home if they believe the child is at risk of harm.

What can I do if my 17 year old refuses to come home?

If your 17-year-old refuses to come home, first try to communicate calmly, understand their reasons, and involve other trusted adults (family, school) while maintaining safety protocols like contacting authorities if concerned for their well-being, as laws vary but parents generally remain responsible for a minor's safety until 18. 

Can your parents legally control you at 17?

Yes, parents generally have the legal right and responsibility to control a 17-year-old, making major decisions, as they are still considered minors until age 18, though teens gain more autonomy; however, this "control" is expected to transition towards teaching responsibility, not abuse, and teens have rights to express views and seek emancipation if independent, notes this article from the Connecticut General Assembly, this Avvo Q&A page, this Quora discussion, and this UCLA blog post. If control feels abusive, seeking help from social services or a lawyer is recommended, says this Quora post, while this Reddit thread offers perspective on managing expectations before full adulthood.
 

Can I ask my 17 year old to move out?

Aged 16-17

When you're 16 or over, you have the right to leave home without your parent's or carer's permission and your parents or carers have the right to ask you to leave. If you decide to move out or run away, your parents or carers can call the police.

What cannot be appealed?

While the jury's verdict (decision) itself can't be appealed, the judge's final judgment based on the jury's decision can be appealed. Judgment after a judge trial (without a jury). A judge may announce the decision in a written document, but this document itself cannot be appealed.

What is an example of abuse of discretion?

Examples of "abuse of discretion" or judges' mistakes include not allowing an important witness to testify, making improper comments that might influence a jury, showing bias, or making rulings on evidence that deny a person a chance to tell his or her side of the matter.

Who can overrule a judge?

An appellate court (like a Circuit Court or State Supreme Court) is the primary body that can overrule a lower trial court judge by finding legal or procedural errors in their rulings, while the U.S. Supreme Court can overrule both state and federal courts on constitutional matters, and Congress can impeach and remove judges, though this is rare. A judge cannot typically overrule another trial judge's decision unless there's a significant change in circumstances.