What was the constitutional issue in Baker v Carr?
Asked by: Mariah Gorczany | Last update: October 2, 2025Score: 4.3/5 (20 votes)
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the
What was the constitutional question in Baker v. Carr Quizlet?
Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state. What was the Constitutional Question of Baker v. Carr? Did the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over questions of legislative apportionment?
What was the constitutional question in Reynolds v US?
The question raised was whether sincere religious beliefs exempted a practicing member of the Mormon Church from the laws against polygamy. The case was the first time the Supreme Court addressed the meaning of free exercise of religion.
What major precedent was established in Baker v. Carr?
Baker v. Carr provided a profoundly important precedent in that it gave courts a "justiciable constitutional cause of action in which the appellants [in the case] are entitled to a trial and decision."
What arguments were made on behalf of the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?
In response to the suit, the state of Tennessee argued that the issue of legislative redistricting was a “non-justiciable” political question, as the Supreme Court had ruled in Colegrove v. Green (1946). As such, the state argued, redistricting was not properly within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
Baker v. Carr, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]
What is the constitutional issue in Baker v. Carr?
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
Which of the following issues did the Supreme Court cases Baker vs Carr and Reynolds vs Sims deal with?
Both Reynolds v. Sims and Baker v. Carr were landmark United States Supreme Court cases that dealt with the issue of legislative representation and the principle of "one person, one vote.
What was Carr's argument?
Carr involved a claim that the Tennessee legislature had failed to reapportion the state's legislative districts in accordance with the state constitution.
Which of the following is a consequence of the ruling established in Baker v. Carr?
The consequence of Baker v. Carr is that states must create voting districts with relatively similar populations to ensure equal voter representation.
Which of the following best describes the reasoning in Baker v. Carr 1961?
Final answer: Baker v. Carr (1961) established that unequal representation in legislative districts is unconstitutional and subject to court review. This decision allowed federal courts to intervene in political issues concerning redistricting and gerrymandering.
What was the constitutional question?
A constitutional question is a legal problem that can be solved by interpreting a constitution, rather than a law. It's like trying to figure out what the rules are for a game by looking at the instructions, instead of asking someone who's played before.
Why did Reynolds argue the law was unconstitutional?
Reynolds argued that the law was unconstitutional. He reasoned that his religion required him to marry multiple women and the law therefore violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.
What are the most significant constitutional rights of defendants in U.S. courts?
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
What was the key question in Baker v. Carr?
The Holding in Baker v. Carr. The question before the court was whether a state's apportionment plan was purely a question for the state's lawmakers to tackle. The Warren Court, in a 6-2 decision, held that federal courts do have jurisdiction over reapportionment issues.
What is a political question Baker v. Carr?
The Supreme Court expounded on the political question doctrine in Baker v. Carr (1962) , when it held that federal courts should not hear cases which deal directly with issues that the Constitution makes the sole responsibility of the Executive Branch and/or the Legislative Branch .
What was the biggest question during the constitutional Convention?
A central issue at the Convention was whether the federal government or the states would have more power. Many delegates believed that the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, but others feared that a strong federal government would oppress their citizens.
What was the Baker v. Carr case about quizlet?
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the states general assembly was virtually ignored. Bakers suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
What happened in Baker v. Carr AP Gov?
The Court's ruling emphasized that each person's vote should have equal weight, thus ensuring compliance with the Equal Protection Clause. This connection laid the groundwork for future rulings that would further protect voters' rights and promote equitable representation across various states.
Which of the following best summarizes the debate reflected in Baker v. Carr 1962?
Final answer: The case of Baker v. Carr (1962) established that redistricting disputes are justiciable issues that can be reviewed by federal courts, opening the door to Equal Protection Clause challenges to redistricting.
What was the argument in Baker v. Carr?
Case Summary
Baker argued that because of population changes in the state, specifically migration to cities, his vote in an urban area had much less weight than that of a voter in a rural district, thus constituting a “debasement of [his] votes.”
What is the main point of Carr's essay?
Carr's essay emphasizes that the internet is causing the current generation to search for immediacy and to skim texts, which he expresses as a negative and increasingly common event. Carr strategically begins his essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by introducing a quote from the popular movie A Space Odyssey: 2001.
What was the theme of Baker v. Carr?
The Baker decision protected individual rights by holding that unequal representation of citizens is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by courts. In 1964, the Supreme Court heard six more cases regarding legislative apportionment in Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, New York, and Virginia.
What was the effect of the Warren Court's decision in Baker v. Carr 1962 )?
Carr (1962) established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues, which had previously been termed "political questions" outside the courts' jurisdiction.
Which of the following best reflects the holding in the case Baker v. Carr 1962?
Final answer: The landmark case, Baker v. Carr (1962), asserted federal courts' jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges to states' redistricting plans, leading to option b: 'created a one-person, one-vote standard for reviewing congressional districts', best reflecting the case's outcome.
Which of the following potential difficulties could have resulted from this decision: Baker v. Carr?
The Supreme Court's decision in Baker v. Carr mandated that state legislative districts must be drawn to ensure equal representation, potentially leading to state legislatures refusing to comply and causing a constitutional crisis, as well as political struggles including gerrymandering.