What was the decision in Gilbert v California?
Asked by: Alexie Boyle | Last update: March 2, 2025Score: 4.4/5 (57 votes)
What was the Court decision in Gilbert v California?
The California Supreme Court rejected Gilbert's challenge to the admission of certain photographs taken from his apartment pursuant to a warrantless search.
What constitutional principle did the Supreme Court address in Gilbert v. California and how did the Court rule?
(a) The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination reaches compulsory communications, but a mere ha ndwriting exemplar, in contrast with the content of what is written, is a n identifying physical characteristic outside its protection. Pp. 266-267.
What did the ruling in Edwards v California decide?
People of State of California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case where a California law prohibiting the bringing of a non-resident "indigent person" into the state was struck down as unconstitutional.
What was the conclusion of Robinson v California?
Supreme Court ruling in Robinson
The main opinion, by Justice Potter Stewart (joined by Justices Warren, Black and Brennan) in combination with Douglas's concurring opinion, recognized that drug addiction is a disease, and that it is unconstitutional to impose punishment for having a disease.
Gilbert v. California Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Who won Robinson v California?
6–2 decision for Robinson
In a 6-2 decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart, the Court held that laws imprisoning persons afflicted with the "illness" of narcotic addiction inflicted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
What was the decision of Douglas v California?
Yes, the trial court's refusal violated the defendants' equal protection rights. Justice William Douglas delivered the opinion of a 6-3 majority. The Court held that California's treatment of defendants changed depending on whether the defendant could afford counsel.
What was the decision in Ewing v California?
In Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), the Supreme Court held that sending a drug addict who shoplifted three golf clubs to prison for 25 years to life under the three strikes law did not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.
What was the ruling in Horton v California?
7–2 decision
Once an officer has a warrant to search a suspect's house, that officer may seize any obviously incriminating evidence that the officer finds in plain view.
What was the decision in Miller v California?
Speech that is obscene and thus lacking First Amendment protection must be without serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
In what case did the Supreme Court rule the California plan unconstitutional?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Court ruled unconstitutional a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process, but held that affirmative action programs could be constitutional in some circumstances.
What was the first Court case to declare a law unconstitutional?
In Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, the Supreme Court, for the first time, struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional. This decision created the doctrine of judicial review and set up the Supreme Court of the United States as chief interpreter of the Constitution.
What did the Supreme Court rule in a case addressing the constitutionality of the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act?
In a limited ruling, the Court held that the Act's “Medicaid expansion” is unconstitutional in threatening states with loss of existing Medicaid funding if they decline to comply, but that the penalty provision is severable (which means that failure of that provision does not cause the entire Act to fail).
What is the Wade Gilbert rule?
After a suspect has been indicted and has obtained counsel, he/she has a right to have counsel present during a lineup. If the lineup is conducted without counsel present, an identification made cannot be used as evidence in court (Wade-Gilbert rule).
What was the final result in the California Supreme Court in the Moore case?
Decision. The court found that Moore had no property rights to his discarded cells or to any profits made from them.
What did the California Supreme Court decide in People v Hall?
This California Supreme Court case ruled that the testimony of a Chinese man who witnessed a murder by a white man was inadmissible, denying Chinese alongside Native and African Americans the status to testify in courts against whites.
Who won Horton v. California?
Justice John Paul Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court in a 7–2 vote affirming the judgment of the California Court of Appeals. He first noted that the Fourth Amendment protected property against both search and seizure.
What is the Fourth Amendment called?
Constitutional Amendments – Amendment 4 – “The Right to Privacy” Amendment Four to the Constitution was ratified on December 15, 1791. It protects the American people from unreasonable searches and seizures.
What was the U.S. Supreme Court case that forced counties to create equal populated districts based on the doctrine of one person one vote?
In Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), this Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes a "one-person, one-vote" principle.
What happened in Griffin v California?
At the peak of its enthusiasm to expand the constitutional protections of criminal defendants, the Supreme Court struck down the conviction of alleged murderer Eddie Dean Griffin because he had failed to take the stand in his own defense.
What was the decision in Ker v California?
DISCUSSION: The Court held that the surreptitious entry into the apartment was justified because the deputies were investigating narcotics, which was an exigent circumstance, and held that the arrests of the Kers were lawful.
What was the vote for Cohen v California?
Justice John Harlan wrote the majority opinion in Cohen. Justice John Harlan announced the decision of the Court, which reversed the appellate court's ruling in a 5–4 decision.
What was the decision in Robinson v California?
It is unconstitutional for a state to punish a defendant for drug addiction, which is a status rather than an act, when the defendant has not engaged in any illegal conduct involving drugs in the state.
What was the decision in California v Stewart?
At trial, Stewart's statements were introduced. Stewart was convicted of robbery and first-degree murder and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court of California reversed, holding that Stewart should have been advised of his right to remain silent and his right to counsel.
What was the ruling in Edwards v California?
U.S. Supreme Court
P. 314 U. S. 172. 2. A statute of California making it a misdemeanor for anyone knowingly to bring or assist in bringing into the State a nonresident "indigent person" held invalid as an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.